Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances

Year: 2011
Volume: 10
Issue: 18
Page No. 2384 - 2388

In vitro Pharmacodynamics of Enrofloxacin Against an Escherichia coli gyrA Mutant

Authors : Murat Cengiz, Erdem Arslan and Ali Sorucu

Abstract: The aim of this study was to investigate in vitro the pharmacodynamics of Enrofloxacin (ENR) against an Escherichia coli gyrA mutant (E. coli MT/128). Broth microdilution testing was used to determine the Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) amd multi-step resistance selection was performed until reaching 1 μg mL•1 MIC. For time-kill experiments, colony counts were determined by plating each diluted sample onto Plate Count Agar and an integrated pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamics area measure (log ratio area) was applied to all cfu data. A single C-T mutation was found in gyrA at codon 83. Concentration-dependent bacterial killing was observed for E. coli MT/128. Bactericidal activity for this strain was achieved within 4 h at concentrations • 8 times the MIC with no significant regrowth by 24 h.

How to cite this article:

Murat Cengiz, Erdem Arslan and Ali Sorucu, 2011. In vitro Pharmacodynamics of Enrofloxacin Against an Escherichia coli gyrA Mutant. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances, 10: 2384-2388.

INTRODUCTION

Escherichia coli (E. coli) is an important pathogen causing gastrointestinal infections and septicemia in humans and animals and a range of secondary conditions, including respiratory tract infections in animals (Katie et al., 2005). The Fluoroquinolones (FQs) have excellent in vitro activities against human and animal clinical E. coli isolates. However, the number of reports of FQ-resistant E. coli strains isolated from humans and animals is increasing (Orden et al., 2001). E. coli, the most studied microbial model was used because its DNA gyrase-mediated mechanisms of quinolone resistance are likely applicable to a broad range of bacteria (Hooper, 2001).

Quinolones comprise a large group of synthetic antimicrobial agents and are generally divided into four generations depending on their bioavailabilities, distributions and spectra of activities. The drugs, the FQs, exhibit increased activity against the Enterobacteriaceae and other gram-negative bacteria and have some activity against certain gram-positive cocci. The 1st of the FQs approved for use in animals is Enrofloxacin (ENR) (Martinez et al., 2006). Quinolones inhibit DNA gyrase and topoisomerase IV by stabilizing the DNA-enzyme complex blocking the progression of the DNA polymerase for replication (Hooper, 2001; Tran and Jacoby, 2002). To preserve effectiveness of FQs in the face of an increasing prevalence of resistant strains, optimal dosing regimens should be implemented with respect to both bactericidal effect and potential selection of resistant strains (Olofsson et al., 2007). The bactericidal activity of FQs is dose-dependent amd the goal of a dosing regimen is to maximize the achievable drug concentrations in relation to the Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) for a pathogen (Kays and Denys, 2001). Effective dosing regimens for such antibiotics requires that either the 24 h AUC/MIC ratio be at least 100-125 against gram-negative bacilli or the Cmax/MIC ratio of the causative pathogen be >10 (Levison, 2004). The study of pharmacodynamics is central to the optimization of antimicrobial therapy (Owens and Ambrose, 2001). In vitro pharmacodynamic models can provide important information about the time course of an antimicrobial effect which can be used in the dose-response relationship and to determine Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) target measures that are predictive of clinical efficacy (Craig, 1998; Dalhoff and Schmitz, 2003; Mueller et al., 2004; Gloede et al., 2010).

Considerable information relating to the optimal use of these agents is available in veterinary medicine, since the FQs are relatively new antimicrobial agents (Coulet et al., 2002). Although, various studies have been carried out on the pharmacodynamic properties of FQs (Ross et al., 2001; Coulet et al., 2002; Zhanel et al., 2002), no specific attempt has been made to determine the dose-response relationship of ENR for resistant E. coli strains. Thus, the objective of the present study was to investigate in vitro the pharmacodynamics of ENR against an E. coli gyrA mutant.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Evaluation of bacterial susceptibility: Broth microdilution testing was performed to determine the MICs according to the guidelines of the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS M7-A6). The E. coli culture was prepared in Mueller-Hinton Broth (MHB) at 37°C for 16-20 h. ENR (Fluka) was obtained as an analytical standard powder and was dissolved in 20:80 methanol/PBS (v/v). Freshly prepared stock solutions were sterilized using 0.20 μm single-use filter units (Minisart, Sartorius Stedim Biotech.). ENR dilutions ranging from 0.004-256 μg mL•1 were prepared in MHB amd inocula with a density equivalent to 0.5 McFarland turbidity were added to tubes containing the ENR dilutions. After incubating at 37°C for 16-20 h, the MICs were defined as the minimum concentration of antibiotic that inhibited growth of the organism. The Optical Densities (ODs) of the cultures were measured at a wavelength of 620 nm.

Multistep resistance selection: Multi-step resistance selection was performed as previously described by Kosowska-Shick et al. (2009). Serial passages were performed daily in MHB for E. coli ATCC25922 in sub-inhibitory concentrations of ENR. For each sub-sequent daily passage, an inoculum of 1-2 dilutions below the MIC that matched the turbidity of a growth control tube was used. Daily passages were performed until reaching a 1 μg mL•1 MIC.

Isolation of total DNA, PCR conditions and sequencing of gyrA: DNA was extracted from bacterial cultures using the Genomic DNA Purification kit (Fermentas) as described by the manufacturer. All extracted DNA samples were stored at -20°C until use.

The genes gyrA and marR were PCR amplified with specific primers as described previously (Everett et al., 1996). The primers were as follows; gyrA-F, 5′- ACGTACTAGGCAATGACTGG; gyrA-R, 5′- AGAAGTCGCCGTCGATAGAAC. The PCR mixture (25 μL total volume) contained 0.2 μM of each primer (Alpha DNA), 2.5 μL reaction buffer (Fermentas), 40 μM dNTP mix (Fermentas), 1.25 mM MgCl2 and 1.5 U Taq DNA polymerase (Fermentas). Isolated DNA (1 μL) was used as the template. PCR amplification (Techne TC3000 Thermal Cycler) was performed with the following conditions; initial denaturation at 94°C for 5 min, 35 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 1 min, annealing at 55°C for 1 min, extension at 72°C for 1 min and a final extension step at 72°C for 10 min. Aliquots (5 μL) were mixed with 2 μL of loading dye (Bio-Rad) and analyzed by electrophoresis on a 1% (w/v) agarose gel using a 100 bp DNA ladder (Fermentas). The gel was stained with ethidium bromide (Vivantis Biochemical). All PCR products were sequenced by Macrogen, Inc. (Korea).

Time-kill experiments: Time-kill experiments were performed as described by Begic et al. (2009). A liquid overnight bacterial culture of the mutant strain E. coli MT/128 was diluted with MHB and a standard antibiotic stock solution to achieve a starting inoculum of ~106 cfu mL•1. The following ENR concentrations were tested; 0, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 16 and 32 times the MIC. Each 10 mL culture was incubated at 37°C amd samples were withdrawn for the determination of bacterial counts at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 24 h. Colony counts were determined by plating 100 μL of each diluted sample onto Plate Count Agar (Merck).

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analyses: An integrated pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic area measure (log ratio area) was applied to all cfu data as described by Booker et al. (2005). The AUCFU0-24 for both growth control and drug containing regimens was normalized by the AUcfu0-24 of the growth control and logarithm of this ratio was used to quantify the drug effect as shown in Eq. 1 (Begic et al., 2009):

(1)

Using non-linear regression, a four-parameter, concentration-effect, Hill-type model was fitted to the effect parameter using OriginLab (Version 8). The inputs were as follows; the dependent variable (E) was log ratio area, E0 was the measured effect with no drug added, Emax was the maximal effect, C:MIC was the concentration of drug divided by MIC, EC50 was the C:MIC for which there was 50% maximal effect and H was the Hill constant.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The MIC of ENR for E. coli reference strain ATCC 25922 was ≤0.032 μg mL•1. This strain was subjected to daily passages in the presence of sub-inhibitory concentrations of ENR. A resistant strain E. coli MT/128 was produced after ENR passage with an increase in MIC from 0.032 to μg mL•1.

The DNA sequences were analyzed using the BLAST program (http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi). For gyrA, the E. coli MT/128 sequence was compared to that of strain ATCC 11775 (GenBank Accession No.AF052254) reported by Weigel et al. (1998).

Fig. 1: Time-kill experiments evaluating the bactericidal activity of enrofloxacin against E. coli strain MT/128

A single Ct-T mutation was found in gyrA at codon 83, resulting in a Ser83Leu substition. The mutantion was represent in low-level (1 μg mL•1) ENR-resistant E. coli and demonstrated typical target site changes. A concentration-dependent bacterial killing was observed for E. coli MT/128 with increasing concentrations resulting in greater reduction in bacterial colonies (Fig. 1). Bactericidal activity for E. coli MT/128 was achieved within 4 h at concentrations • 8 times the MIC. The pharmacodynamics of ENR against the gyrA mutant of E. coli are shown in Fig. 2. There was a strong correlation between the log ratio area and the C:MIC (R2 = 0.98). Bacterial inactivation, corresponding to a 4 log reduction was achieved by an ENR concentration of 8 times the MIC within 4 h; no significant regrowth occurred by 24 h. The mutant strain displayed a concentration-effect profile with a Hill’s constant of 1.37. The ENR Emax and EC50 for this strain were 4 and 0.25, respectively.

In recent years, resistance to FQs has been frequently described in clinically isolated E. coli in the literature (Drago et al., 2010; Gibson et al., 2010; Bansal and Tandon, 2011).

Therefore, researchers determined the pharmaco-dynamics of ENR for low-level resistant E. coli. In this study, the pharmacodynamics properties of ENR were determined using a log ratio area approach, since this was previously reported as a better fit to the model than the log ratio change approach (Tsuji et al., 2008a, b).

In the current study, the MIC of ENR increased slightly from 0.032-1 μg mL•1. This low level of quinolone resistance in E. coli MT/128 resulted from a single mutation in gyrA (Ser83Leu).

Fig. 2: Pharmacodynamic properties of enrofloxacin against E. coli strain MT/128

Low levels of resistance to nalidixic acid and ciprofloxacin were also detected in E. coli strains isolated from clinical samples amd the MICs of ciprofloxacin for these strains ranged from 0.125-1.2 μg mL•1 (Khan et al., 2005). A single mutation at the ser83 codon in gyrA is also associated with a very low level of resistance to quinolones (Lee et al., 2005).

Dosing regimens are important to minimize the emergence and selection of antibiotic-resistant bacterial strains. The PK/PD measure remains an important predictor of response to antimicrobial therapy and helps to determine the correct dosage (Barger et al., 2003; Booker et al., 2005; Olofsson et al., 2007).

NCCLS (2003) suggests breakpoints for ENR of 0.5 μg mL•1 for susceptible microorganisms, 1 μg mL•1 for microorganisms of intermediate susceptibility and 2 μg mL•1 for those that are resistant (NCCLS, 2001).

However, a single mutation in gyrA attributes to low-level resistance against FQs with a 2-8 fold increase in the MIC (Hooper, 2001). In this study, the pharmacodynamics properties of ENR were described by a Hill-type sigmoidal, maximal effect model, displaying concentration-dependent activity against E. coli MT/128; the maximal effect was achieved at higher thresholds of • 8 times the MIC.

The increase in the PK/PD breakpoint given by this higher dosage suggests that a higher dose should always result in a better efficacy. However, an increase in the dosage usually correlates with increasing efficacy only within a narrow concentration range (Barger et al., 2003). Taken together, the results of this study show that the kill rate of the mutant strain did not change by increasing the concentration of ENR from 16-32 μg mL•1.

A Hill-type sigmoidal model can be used to describe the pharmacodynamics of ENR against resistant-E. coli with a 32-fold an increase in the MIC resulting in a single gyrA mutation. Development of quinolone resistance can also be predicted using this model since the approach used in the study enables the detection of the correct dosages for bactericidal effect of ENR against resistant E. coli strains. Notably, an increase in the dosage causes an increasing efficacy only within a narrow concentration range and the activity of ENR does not change at high concentrations.

CONCLUSION

These results show that increasing in ENR dosage increases its efficacy only within a narrow concentration range amd the activity of this antibiotic does not change at high concentrations.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Financial support from the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey-TUBITAK (TOVAG-110O478) and COST BM0701 (ATENS) is gratefully acknowledged.

Design and power by Medwell Web Development Team. © Medwell Publishing 2024 All Rights Reserved