The Social Sciences

Year: 2012
Volume: 7
Issue: 2
Page No. 283 - 288

Factors Contributing to Research Misconducts

Authors : Latifah Amin, Siti Zaimah Zainal, Zaharah Hassan and Maznah Hj. Ibrahim

References

Abidin, Z.N. and M.R. Ayudin, 2008. Kerjaya Sebagai Pensyarah. PTS Professional Publishing, Malay, Kuala Lumpur, Pages: 156.

Anderson, M.S., 1996. Misconduct and departmental context: Evidence from the Acadia Institute's graduate education project. J. Inform. Ethics, 5: 15-33.

Barlow, D.H., 2001. Publication ethics and human reproduction. Hum. Reprod., Vol. 16 10.1093/humrep/16.8.1541

Broome, M.E., 2003. Scientific integrity. Nursing Outlook, 51: 197-198.

Chapman, K., 2009. UPM lecturers hauled up over plagiarism. (The Star, 15 September 2009). Integrity and Misconduct in Research, Office of Research Integrity.

DHHS, 2005. 42 CFR parts 50 and 93 public health service policies on research misconduct; final rule. Federal Register, 70: 28370-28400.
Direct Link  |  

Davis, M.S. and M.L. Riske, 2002. Preventing Scientific Misconduct: Insights from Convicted Offenders. In: Investigating Research Integrity: First ORI Research Conference on Research Integrity, Steneck, N.H. and M.D. Scheetz (Eds.). Office of Research Integrity, Rockville.

Davis, M.S., 2003. The role of culture in research misconduct. Accountability Res., 11: 189-201.
PubMed  |  Direct Link  |  

Davis, M.S., M.R. Morris and S.R. Diaz, 2007. Causal factors implicated in research misconduct: Evidence from ORI case files. Sci. Eng. Ethics, 13: 395-414.
PubMed  |  Direct Link  |  

Dhand, R., 2002. Does research misconduct extend beyond biomedicine? The COPE Report 2002. http://publicationethics.org/static/2002/2002pdf4.pdf.

Dresser, R., 1993. Defining scientific misconduct: The relevance of mental state. J. Am. Med. Assoc., 269: 985-987.
PubMed  |  Direct Link  |  

Fanelli, D., 2009. How many scientists fabricate and falsify research? A systematic review and meta-analysis of survey data. PLoS ONE Vol. 4.

Goodstein, D., 2002. Scientific misconduct. Academe, 88: 8-31.
Direct Link  |  

Hansen, B.C. and K.D. Hansen, 1995. Academic and scientific misconduct: Issues for nursing educators. J. Prof. Nursing, 11: 31-39.
PubMed  |  Direct Link  |  

James, N., J. Burrage and B. Smith, 2003. Scientific integrity: A review of the Institute of Medicine's (IOM) reports. Nursing Outlook, 51: 239-341.
PubMed  |  Direct Link  |  

Jones, A.H., 2003. Can authorship policies help prevent scientific misconduct? What role for scientific societies? Sci. Eng. Ethics, 9: 243-256.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Jones, R., 2002. Research misconduct. Family Pract., 19: 123-124.
Direct Link  |  

Louis, K.S., M.S. Anderson and L. Rosenberg, 1995. Academic misconduct and values: The department's influence. Rev. Higher Educ., 8: 393-422.
Direct Link  |  

Martin, B., 1992. Scientific fraud and power structure of science. Prometheus, 10: 83-98.
Direct Link  |  

Meyer III, W.M. and G.M. Bernier Jr., 2002. Potential cultural factors in scientific misconduct allegations. Proceedings of the 1st ORI Research Conference on Research Integrity, November, 19-20, 2001, Bethesda, Maryland, pp: 163-166.

Morrison, R.S., 1990. Disreputable science: Definition and detection. J. Adv. Nursing, 15: 911-913.
PubMed  |  Direct Link  |  

Mumford and Helton, 2002. Organizational influence on scientific integrity. Proceedings of the First ORI Research Conference on Research Integrity in Bethesda, November 19-20, 2000, Maryland, pp: 73-90.

NAS., NAE. and Institute of Medicine, 1992. Responsible Science: Ensuring the Integrity of the Research Process. Vol. 1, National Academies Press, Washington, DC., USA.

Redman, B.K. and A.L. Caplan, 2005. Off with their heads: The need to criminalize some forms of scientific misconduct. J. Law Med. Ethics, 33: 345-346.
PubMed  |  Direct Link  |  

Resnik, D.B., 2010. What is ethics in research and why is it important? National Instit. Environ. Health Sci.

Saat, M.M. and M.J. Noriza and O. Aniza, 2004. Lecturers and students perceptions on ethics in academia and lecturer-student interaction. University Technology Malaysia.

Smith, R., 2009. Failure to confront research fraud. Interdisziplinare Onkologie, 1: 16-19.
Direct Link  |  

Sugarmann, S.D., 2005. Conflict of interest in the roles of university professor. Theoret. Inquiries Law Vol., 6.

Tindemans, P., 2007. Report of Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) global science forum. Proceedings of the Best Practices for Ensuring Scientific Integrity and Preventing Misconduct. February 22-23, 2007, Tokyo, Japan -.

Wasunna, A. and T. Murray, 2011. Professional responsibilities in medical research: How Is Research Misconduct Defined?, Why Does Research Misconduct Occur?. Consequences of Research Misconduct. http://science.jrank.org/pages/63395/professional-responsibilities-in-medical.

Woolf, P., 1981. Fraud in science. Hastings Centre Rep., 11: 9-14.

Woollen, S.W., 2001. Scientific misconduct: The F word. United States Food and Drug Administration Office of Good Clinical Practice Presentation. http://www.pbelow-consulting.com/pdf/f_word_woollen_elhage_1001.pdf.

Design and power by Medwell Web Development Team. © Medwell Publishing 2024 All Rights Reserved