The Social Sciences

Year: 2016
Volume: 11
Issue: 30
Page No. 7168 - 7171

Incorporating Learning Agents in Blended Learning

Authors : Choo-Kim Tan and Choo-Peng Tan

References

Allen, I.E., J. Seaman and R. Garrett, 2007. Blending in the extent and promise of blended education in the United States. Online Learning Consortium, Needham, Massachusetts.

Baylor, A.L., 2009. Promoting motivation with virtual agents and avatars: Role of visual presence and appearance. Philos. Trans. Royal Soc. London B. Biol. Sci., 364: 3559-3565.
CrossRef  |  PubMed  |  Direct Link  |  

Baylor, A.L., J. Ryu and E. Shen, 2003. The effects of pedagogical agent voice and animation on learning, motivation and perceived persona. Proceeding of the Annual World conference of Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunication, June 23-28, 2003, Honolulu, Hawaii, pp: 452-458.

Bersin, J., 2004. The Blended Learning Book: Best Practices, Proven Methodologies and Lessons Learned. John Wiley and Sons, San Francisco, CA., Pages: 330.

Center for Digital Education, 2012. Realizing the full potential of blended learning. Center for Digital Education, Folsom, California.

Cheng, Y.M. and P.F. Chen, 2012. Autonomous pedagogical agents to e-learning in elementary school. J. Inf. Hiding Multimedia Signal Process., 3: 378-380.
Direct Link  |  

Driscoll, M., 2002. Blended learning: Let’s get beyond the hype. E. Learn., 1: 1-4.
Direct Link  |  

Kim, Y. and Q. Wei, 2011. The impact of learner attributes and learner choice in an agent-based environment. Comput. Educ., 56: 505-514.
Direct Link  |  

Kramer, N.C. and G. Bente, 2010. Personalizing E-learning: The social effects of pedagogical agents. Educ. Psychol. Rev., 22: 71-87.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

McCraty, R., T. Dana, A. Mike, A. Pam and J. Stephen, 2000. Improving test-taking skills and academic performance in high school students using heart math learning enhancement tools. Institute-Heartmath, San Jose, California.

OME., 2016. E-learning ontario: Blended learning. Ontario Ministry of Education, Toronto, Ontario.

Perez, L.M.V., P.M.C. Lopez and R.L. Ariza, 2011. Blended learning in higher education: Students perceptions and their relation to outcomes. Comput. Educ., 56: 818-826.
Direct Link  |  

Rossett, A. and R.V. Frazee, 2006. Blended Learning Opportunities. AMACOM Publisher, New York, USA.,.

Tien, L.T. and K. Osman, 2010. Pedagogical agents in interactive multimedia modules: Issues of variability. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci., 7: 605-612.
Direct Link  |  

Design and power by Medwell Web Development Team. © Medwell Publishing 2024 All Rights Reserved