HOME JOURNALS CONTACT

Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances

Influence of Cracked, Coarse Grind, or Fine Grind of Corn on Digestion and Rumen Function in Steers Fed a 73% Corn-Based Diet
Alejandro Plascencia and A.V. Jose Maria

Abstract: Four Holstein steers (142±9.3 kg) with cannulas in the rumen and p>roximal duodenum were used in a 4x4 Latin square experiment to evaluate the influence of corn processing on digestive function. Four dietary treatments were compared: 1) SFC (density = 0.31 kg L-1); 2) coarsely-ground corn (DRC-CG, density = 0.55 kg L-1); 3) Medium-coarsely Ground-corn (DRC-MG, density = 0.50 kg L-1) and 4) Fine-ground corn (DRC-FG, density = 0.45 kg L-1).The basal diet contained 73.25 corn and 9.8 % forage. Method of corn processing had no effect (p>0.10) on ruminal pH, VFA or methane production. There were no treatment effects (p>0.10) on ruminal digestion of feed N and ruminal microbial efficiency. Ruminal and total tract digestion of ADF was not affected (p>0.10) by corn processing. Ruminal digestibility of OM and starch was greater (12.6 and 14%, respectively; p>0.10) for SFC than for DRC-CG, DRC-MG and DRC-FG. Total-tract digestibilities of OM, starch, N and DE were greater (6.1, 3.9, 8.4 and 7.3% respectively, p>0.10) for SFC than for DRC treatments. Total tract digestibility of starch tended to increase (linear component, p>0.10) with degree of dry processing, although total tract digestibility of OM and GE was not improved (p>0.10). Given that the DE value of SFC was 4.10 Mcal kg-1, the DE values for DRC-CG, DRC-MG and DRC-FG were 3.88, 3.71 and 3.60 Mcal kg-1, respectively. It is concluded that the feeding value of dry-processed corn is not enhanced by reducing the particle size of the kernels beyond to that obtained following coarse rolling.

How to cite this article
Alejandro Plascencia and A.V. Jose Maria , 2007. Influence of Cracked, Coarse Grind, or Fine Grind of Corn on Digestion and Rumen Function in Steers Fed a 73% Corn-Based Diet. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances, 6: 118-122.

© Medwell Journals. All Rights Reserved