References

Ajzen, I. and M. Fishbein, 1970. The prediction of behavior from attitudinal and normative variables. J. Exp. Social Psychol., 6: 466-487.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Ajzen, I., 1991. The theory of planned behavior. Organiz. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process., 50: 179-211.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Ajzen, I., 2001. Nature and operation of attitudes. Ann. Rev. Psychol., 52: 27-58.
Direct Link  |  

Amoako-Gyampah, K. and A.F. Salam, 2004. An extension of the technology acceptance model in an ERP implementation environment. Inform. Manage., 41: 731-745.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Chanaron, J.J., D. Jolly and K. Soderquist, 2002. Technological management: A tentative research agenda. Int. J. Technol. Manag., 23: 618-629.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Chen, I.J., K.F. Yang, F.I. Tang, C.H. Huang and S. Yu, 2008. Applying the technology acceptance model to explore public health nurse's intentions towards web-based learning: A cross-sectional questionnaire survey. Int. J. Nurs. Stud., 45: 869-878.
CrossRef  |  PubMed  |  Direct Link  |  

Davis, F.D., 1989. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quart., 13: 319-340.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Davis, F.D., 1993. User acceptance of information technology: System characteristics, user perceptions and behavioral impacts. Int. J. Man Mach. Stud., 38: 475-487.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Davis, F.D., R.P. Bagozzi and P.R. Warshaw, 1989. User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Manage. Sci., 35: 982-1003.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Klopping, M.I. and E. McKinney, 2004. Extending the technology acceptance model and task technology fit model to consumer e-commerce. Inform. Technol. Learn. Perform. J., 22: 35-48.
Direct Link  |  

Malhotra, Y. and D.F. Galleta, 1999. Extending the technology acceptance model to account for social influence: Theoretical bases and empirical validation. Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, January 5-8, 1999, Maui, HI., USA -.

Porter, C.E. and N. Donthu, 2006. Using the technology acceptance model to explain how attitudes determine Internet usage: The role of perceived access barriers and demographics. J. Business Res., 59: 999-1007.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Sivo, S. and J. Brophy, 2003. Student's attitude in a web-enhanced hybrid course: A structural equaadon modeling inquiry. J. Educ. Media Lib. Sci., 41: 181-194.
Direct Link  |  

Spacey, R., A. Goulding and I. Murray, 2004. Exploring the attitudes of public library staff to the internet using the TAM. J. Doc., 60: 550-564.
Direct Link  |  

Thong, J.Y.L., W.H. Hong and K.R. Tam, 2002. Understanding user acceptance of digital libraries: What are the roles of interface characteristics, organizational context and individual differences? Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud., 57: 215-242.
CrossRef  |  

Yaghmaie, F., 2003. Content validation and its estimation. J. Med. Educ., 3: 25-27.

Yi, M.Y. and Y. Hwang, 2003. Predicting the use of web-based Information systems: Self-efficacy, enjoyment, learning goal orientation and the technology acceptance model. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud., 59: 431-449.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |