References

Bailey, R.A., P.J. Cameron and R. Connelly, 2008. Sudoku, gerechte designs, resolutions, affine space, spreads, reguli and hamming codes. Am. Math. Mon., 115: 383-404.
Direct Link  |  

Crawford, B., C. Castro and E. Monfroy, 2009. Solving Sudoku With Constraint Programming. In: Cutting-Edge Research Topics on Multiple Criteria Decision Making, Shi, Y., S. Wang, Y. Peng, J. Li and Y. Zeng (Eds.)., Springer, Berlin, Germany, ISBN: 978-3-642-02297-5, pp: 345-348.

Dabbaghian, V. and T. Wu, 2013. Recursive construction of non-cyclic pandiagonal Latin squares. Discrete Math., 313: 2835-2840.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Delahaye, J.P., 2006. The science behind sudoku Sci. Am., 294: 80-87.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Deng, X.Q. and Y.D. Li, 2013. A novel hybrid genetic algorithm for solving sudoku puzzles. Optim. Lett., 7: 241-257.
Direct Link  |  

Emanouilidis, E., 2008. Latin and cross Latin squares. Int. J. Math. Educ. Sci. Technol., 39: 697-700.
Direct Link  |  

Fontana, R., 2014. Random Latin squares and sudoku designs generation. Electron. J. Stat., 8: 883-893.
Direct Link  |  

Gabor, A.F. and G.J. Woeginger, 2010. How not to solve a sudoku. Oper. Res. Lett., 38: 582-584.
Direct Link  |  

Kuhl, J.S. and T. Denley, 2012. A few remarks on avoiding partial Latin squares. Ars. Comb.,

Kumar, A., V. Varghese, E. Varghese and S. Jaggi, 2015. On the construction of designs with three-way blocking. Model Assisted Stat. Appl., 10: 43-52.

Semeniuk, I., 2005. Stuck on you. New Sci., 188: 45-47.

Subramani, J. and K.N. Ponnuswamy, 2009. Construction and analysis of sudoku designs. Model Assisted Stat. Appl., 4: 287-301.