The Social Sciences

Year: 2010
Volume: 5
Issue: 5
Page No. 454 - 457

Hafiz or Shakespeare? Which One Is More Polite?

Authors : Razieh Rabbani Yekta and Abbass Eslami Rasekh

References

Aliakbari, M. and A. Toni, 2008. The realization of address terms in modern persian in Iran: A sociolinguistic study. Linguistik Online,

Argaman, E., 2007. With or without it: The role of empathetic diexis in mediating. J. Pragmatics, 39: 1591-1607.
CrossRef  |  

Davis, D., 2004. On not translating Hafez. N. Engl. Rev., 25: 310-318.

Fillmore, C.J., 1975. Santa Cruz Lectures on Deixis. Indiana University Linguistics Club, Bloomington, pp: 1-15.

Gu, Y., 1990. Politeness phenomena in modern Chinese. J. Pragmatics, 14: 237-257.

Hanks, W.F., 2005. Exploration in the diectic field. Curr. Anthropol., 46: 191-220.
Direct Link  |  

Ide, S., 1989. Formal forms and discernment: Two neglected aspects of universals of politeness. Multilingua, 8: 223-248.

Ide, S., 1993. The search for integrated universals of linguistic politeness. Multilingua, 12: 7-11.

Koike, D.A., 1992. Language and Social Relationship in Brazilian Portuguese: The Pragmatics of Politeness. University of Texas Press, Austin.

Leech, G., 1983. Principles of Pragmatics. 1st Edn., Longman Publisher, New York.

Levinson, S.C., 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, ISBN: 9780521294140, Pages: 420.

Levinson, S.C., 2006. Deixis. In: The Handbook of Pragmatics, Horn, L. and G. Ward (Eds.). Blackwell Publishing Ltd., Oxford.

Lyons, J., 1977. Semantics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Magnusson, L., 1999. Shakespeare and Social Dialogue: Dramatic Language and Elizabethan Letters. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Mao, L.M.R., 1994. Beyond politeness theory: Face revisited and renewed. J. Pragmat., 21: 451-486.
CrossRef  |  

Matsumoto, Y., 1989. Politeness and conversational universals-observations from Japanese. Multilingua, 8: 207-221.

Design and power by Medwell Web Development Team. © Medwell Publishing 2024 All Rights Reserved