References

Christiansen, F.V. and C. Rump, 2007. Getting it right: Conceptual development from student to experienced engineer. Eur. J. Eng. Educ., 32: 467-479.
Direct Link  |  

Lindsay, E.D. and M.C. Good, 2005. Effects of laboratory access modes upon learning outcomes. IEEE. Trans. Educ., 48: 619-631.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Nedic, Z., J. Machotka and A. Nafalski, 2003. Remote laboratories versus virtual and real laboratories. Proceedings of the FIE 2003 33rd Annual Frontiers in Education, 2003, November 5-8, 2003, IEEE, ISBN:0-7803-7961-6, pp: T3E-1-T3E-6.

Polanyi, M., 1966. The Tacit Dimension. Anchor, Garden City, New York.

Razali, Z.B., 2015. Novel Method of Assessing Practical Intelligence Acquired in Mechatronics Laboratory Classes: Novices-Experts Methods. In: Handbook of Research on Advancements in Robotics and Mechatronics, Maki, K.H. (Ed.). IGI Global, Hershey, Pennsylvania, pp: 895-928.

Schmidt, F.L. and J.E. Hunter, 1993. Tacit knowledge, practical intelligence, general mental ability and job knowledge. Current Directions Psychol. Sci., 2: 8-9.
Direct Link  |  

Somech, A. and R. Bogler, 1999. Tacit knowledge in academia: Its effects on student learning and achievement. J. Psychol., 133: 605-616.
Direct Link  |  

Sternberg, R.J. and R.K. Wagner, 1993. The G-ocentric view of intelligence and job performance is wrong. Current Directions Psychol. Sci., 2: 1-4.
Direct Link  |  

Trevelyan, J., 2007. Technical coordination in engineering practice. J. Eng. Educ., 96: 191-204.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Trevelyan, J.P. and Z.B. Razali, 2012. What do Students Gain from Laboratory Experiences?. In: Internet Accessible Remote Laboratories; Scalable E-Learning Tools for Engineering and Science Disciplines, Abdul, K.M.A., E.A. Michael and V.J. Harward (Eds.). Engineering Science Reference, Hershey, Pennsylvania, ISBN:978-1-61350-188-7, pp: 416-431.

Wall, K., 2010. Engineering: Issues, Challenges and Opportunities for Development. UNESCO, Paris, France, ISBN:978-92-3-104156-3,.