Authors : Elnaz Alineghad and Leila Mosafer Yadegar
Abstract: One of the juridical and religious jurisprudence differences between men and women is their difference in jurisdiction. Jurisdiction is a kind of religious stewardship from God and in accord with that he has the right to seizure life, property and credit of the people. Therefore, it is very dangerous that doing it requires a special condition to be done properly which anyone cannot assume the responsibility. Hence, no one can be thought to be deserved this elevated status. Understanding of the rights and dignity of women is based on unbiased investigation which is firmed up on actual and natural basis. Unfortunately, most of the time, avoiding extreme will lead people to wastage. Or hating wastage they will be forced to boast and extreme. Therefore, this study is sought to investigate and criticize quite unbiasedly the arguments of opponents of women judges. The current study is a juridical-jurisprudence by the title. The data are collected in library research. The research purpose and question are functional.
Elnaz Alineghad and Leila Mosafer Yadegar, 2016. The Philosophical Investigation and Critics of the Opponent’s Reason Against Women’s Judgment. Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 11: 3114-3117.