Authors : Jurairat Kurukodt, Ponlakit Jitto and Somsanguan Passago
Abstract: From the study on Molasses quantity efficiency organic by using earthworm (Pheretima peguana), in the study has been divided into 6 sets of experimental set, which were T1 was a controller by using an organic waste from vegetables and left them naturally decomposed, T2 was a controller by using an organic waste from vegetables, which were mixed with molasses in the proportion of 1:5 1:10 and 1:15 kg mL-1 and left them naturally decomposed, T3 used the earthworms in the amount 0.5 kg to decompose the organic waste from vegetables, T4 used the earthworms in the amount 0.5 kg to decompose the organic waste from vegetables, which were mixed with molasses in the proportion of 1:5 kg mL-1, T5 used the earthworms in the amount of 0.5 kg to decompose the organic waste from vegetables, which were mixed with molasses in the proportion of 1:10 kg mL-1 and T6 used the earthworms in the amount of 0.5 kg to decompose the organic waste from vegetables, which were mixed with molasses in the proportion of 1:15 kg mL-1. The study has a propose as following: To find an efficiency of organic waste disposal, which is limitedly had the least time duration. To compare time durations in disposing an organic waste from vegetables by using earthworm (P. peguana). From the study has found that the earthworms (P. peguana) were able to dispose the organic wastes, which mixed with molasses, which is quicker than the organic waste without molasses. When, brought all 6 experimental sets to compare the time durations in disposing an organic waste form vegetables, had found that experimental set T6 was the best in decomposing organic waste, which took only 3 days, secondly, were the experimental sets of T5 and T4, for the least time duration, which took 9 days to decompose organic wastes was the experimental set of T1.
Jurairat Kurukodt, Ponlakit Jitto and Somsanguan Passago, 2009. The Study on Molasses Quantity Efficiency Organic by Using Earthworm (Pheretima peguana). Research Journal of Applied Sciences, 4: 189-191.