References

Adams, A.M., T.G. Evans, R. Mohammed and J. Farnsworth, 1997. Socioeconomic stratification by wealth ranking: Is it valid. World Dev., 25: 1165-1172.
CrossRef  |  

Adesina, A.A. and J. Baidu-Forson, 1995. Farmers perception and adoption of new agricultural technology: Evidence from analysis in Burkina Faso and Guinea West Africa. Agric. Econ., 13: 1-9.
Direct Link  |  

Adesina, A.A. and M.M. Zinnah, 1993. Technology characteristics, farmers' perceptions and adoption decisions: A Tobit model application in Sierra Leone. Agric. Econ., 9: 297-311.
Direct Link  |  

Adesina, A.A. and S. Seidi, 1995. Farmers perceptions and adoption of new agricultural technology: Analysis of modern mangrove rice varieties in Guinea Bissau. Q. J. Int. Agric., 34: 358-370.

Alene, A.D., D. Poonyth and R.M. Hassan, 2000. Determinants of adoption and intensity of use of utilization of improvedmaize varieties in the central highlands of Ethiopia: A tobit analysis. Agrekon, 39: 633-643.
Direct Link  |  

Barrett, C.B., 2005. Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods in analyzing poverty dynamics. Proceedings of the Workshop on SAGA Qualitative-Quantitative Methods for Poverty Analysis, March 11, Grand Regency Hotel, Nairobi, Kenya, pp: 37-58.

Bellon, M.R., 2001. Participatory Research Methods for Technology Evaluation: A Manual for Scientists Working with Farmers. International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center, Mexico, D.F.

CIMMYT, 1993. The Adoption of Agricultural Technology: A Guide for Survey Design. In: Adoption of Improved Wheat Technologies in Adaba and Dodola Woredas of the Bale Highlands, Ethiopia, Kotu, B.H., H. Verkuijl, W. Mwangi and D. Tanner (Eds.). International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT) and Ethiopian Agricultural Research Organization (EARO), Mexico, D.F.

Carvalho, S. and H. White, 1996. Combining the Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches to Poverty Measurement and Analysis: The Practice and the Potential. World Bank Publications, Washington, DC., pp: 16.

Chambers, R., 1994. Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA): Analysis of experience. World Dev., 22: 1253-1268.
Direct Link  |  

Chambers, R., 1994. The origins and practice of participatory rural appraisal. World Dev., 22: 953-969.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Chianu, J.N. and H. Tsujii, 2004. Determinants of farmers decision to adopt or not adopt inorganic fertilizer in the savannas of Northern Nigeria. Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosyst., 70: 293-301.
CrossRef  |  

Cramb, R. and T. Purcell, 2001. How to Monitor and Evaluate Impacts of Participatory Research Projects: A Case Study of Forages for Smallholders Project. CIAT Workshop Document, No. 185, CIAT and ACIAR, Australia..

Denzin, N. and Y. Lincoln, 1994. Handbook of Qualitative Research. Sage Publications, London.

Feulefack, J.F. and M. Zeller, 2005. How accurate is Participatory Wealth Ranking (PWR) in targeting the poor: A case study from Bangladesh. Proceedings of the Conference on International Agricultural Research for Development (Tropentag 2005) in Stuttgart-Hohenheim, Oct. 11-13, IRIS Center, University of Maryland, USA., pp: 1-8.

Fielding, N. and M. Schreier, 2001. Introduction: On the compatibility between qualitative and quantitative research methods. Qualitative Social Res., Vol. 2, No. 1.

Filmer, D. and L.H. Pritchett, 2001. Estimating wealth effects without expenditure data- or tears: An application to educational enrollments in states of India. Demography, 38: 115-132.
PubMed  |  Direct Link  |  

Hargreaves, J.R., L.A. Morison, J.S.S. Gear, M.B. Makhubele and J.D.H. Porter et al., 2007. Hearing the voices of the poor: Assigning poverty lines on the basis of local perceptions of poverty. A quantitative analysis of qualitative data from participatory wealth ranking in rural South Africa. World Dev., 35: 212-229.
CrossRef  |  

Kotu, B.H., H. Verkuijl, W. Mwangi and D. Tanner, 2000. Adoption of Improved Wheat Technologies in Adaba and Dodola Woredas of the Bale Highlands, Ethiopia. International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT) and Ethiopian Agricultural Research Organization (EARO), Mexico, D.F.

Langyintuo, A. and M. Mekuria, 2005. Modeling agricultural technology adoption using the software STATA. Proceedings of the Econometric Application to Modeling the Adoption of Agricultural Technologies, Feb. 21-25. International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Harare, Zimbabwe.

Langyintuo, A.S. and C. Mungoma, 2008. The effect of household wealth on the adoption of improved maize varieties in Zambia. Food Policy, 33: 550-559.
CrossRef  |  

Maddala, G.S., 1983. Limited Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Mayring, P., 2001. Combination and integration of qualitative and quantitative analysis. Qualitative Social Res., Vol. 2, No. 1.

McDonald, J.F. and R.A. Moffit, 1980. The uses of tobit analysis. Rev. Econ. Stat., 62: 318-321.
Direct Link  |  

Mwabu, G., 2005. Quantitative and qualitative methods for poverty analysis. Proceedings of the Workshop on SAGA Qualitative-Quantitative Methods for Poverty Analysis, March 11, The Grand Regency Hotel, Nairobi, Kenya, pp: 15-21.

Njeru, E.H.N., 2005. Bridging the qualitative-quantitative methods of poverty analysis. Proceedings of the Workshop on SAGA Qualitative-Quantitative Methods for Poverty Analysis, March 11, The Grand Regency Hotel, Nairobi, Kenya, pp: 23-35.

Nzomoi, J.N., J.K. Byaruhanga, H.K. Maritim and P.I. Omboto, 2007. Determinants of technology adoption in the production of horticultural export produce in Kenya. Afr. J. Bus. Manage., 1: 129-135.
Direct Link  |  

Oladele, O.I., 2005. A Tobit analysis of propensity to discontinue adoption of agricultural technology among farmers in Southwestern Nigeria. J. Central Eur. Agric., 6: 249-254.
Direct Link  |  

Phiri, D., S. Franzel, P. Mafongoya, I. Jere, R. Katanga And S. Phiri, 2004. Who is using the new technology? The association of wealth status and gender with the planting of improved tree fallows in Eastern Province, Zambia. Agric. Syst., 79: 131-144.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Polson, R.A. and D.S.C. Spencer, 1991. The technology adoption process in subsistence agriculture: The case of cassava in Southwestern Nigeria. Agric. Syst., 36: 65-78.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Quisumbing, A., L. Brown, H.S. Feldstem, L. Haddad and C. Pena, 1999. Women: The key to food security. Food Policy Report. International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC.

Rao, P.P. and V.G.K. Rao, 1996. Adoption of rice production technology by the tribal farmers. J. Res. ANGRAU, 24: 21-25.

Rogers, E.M., 1962. Diffusion of Innovations. Free Press, Glencoe, IL.

Tiwari, S.C., A. Kumar and A. Kumar, 2005. Development and standardization of a scale to measure socio-economic status in urban and rural communities in India. Ind. J. Med. Res., 122: 309-314.
PubMed  |  

Voh, P.J., 1982. A study of factors associated with the adoption of recommended farm practices in a Nigerian village. Agric. Admin., 9: 17-27.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

White, H., 2002. Combining quantitative and qualitative approaches in poverty analysis. World Dev., 30: 511-522.
Direct Link  |  

World Bank, 2001. World Development Report 2000/2001. Oxford University Press, New York, USA.

Worrall, E., S. Basu and K. Hanson, 2003. The relationship between socio-economic status and matrix: A review of the literature. Ensuring that Malaria Control Interventions Reach the Poor, London, 5-6, September 2002. http://www.rbm.who.int/cmc_upload/0/000//016/249/SESMalaria_BackgroundPaper.pdf.