References

APCICT, 2007. United nations development Programme-Asia-Pacific development information programme. (UNDP-APDIP) and Asian and Pacific Training Centre for Information and Communication Technology for Development. http://creative-commons.org/licenses/by/2.5/legalcode.

Adelaja, M.A., 2004. The role of smedan in the development of SME sector. Small and Medium Enterprises Development and SMIEIS, pp: 229-231.

Adetayo, J.O., S.A. Sanni and M.O. Ilori, 1999. The impact of information technology on product marketing: A case study of multinational factories in Nigeria. Technovation, 19: 691-699.

Adewoye, J.O., 2007. Impact of information technology investments on banking: Operations in Nigeria. Int. Bus. Manage., 1: 70-78.
Direct Link  |  

Barua, A., C. Kriebel and T. Mukhopadhyay, 1991. Information technology business value: An analytical and Empirical Investigation. University of Texas at Austin Working Paper, May.

Berndt, E.R. and T.W. Malone, 1995. Information technology and productivity paradox: Getting the question right: guest editor's introduction to special issue. Econ. Innovation New Technol., 3: 177-182.

Boyett, J.H. and J.T. Boyett, 1995. Beyond Workplace 2000: Essential Strategies for the New American Corporation, Dutton, New Yark, ISBN: 9780525937821, Pages: 298.

Bresnahan, T.F., E. Brynjolfsson and L.M. Hitt, 2002. Information technology, workplace organization and the demand for skilled labor: Firm level evidence. Q. J. Econ., 117: 339-376.
Direct Link  |  

Brynjolfsson, E. and L. Hitt, 1996. Paradox lost Firm-level evidence on the returns to information systems. Manage. Sci., 42: 541-558.
Direct Link  |  

Clemons, E.K. and M.C. Row, 1991. Sustaining IT advantage: the role of structural differences. Manage. Inform. Syst. Quart., 15: 275-292.

Dewan, S. and K.L. Kraemer, 2000. Information technology and productivity: Evidence from country level data. Manage. Sci., 46: 548-562.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Ihua, U.B., 2009. SMEs key failure-factors. A comparison between the United Kingdom and Nigeria. J. Social Sci., 18: 199-207.
Direct Link  |  

King, W.R. and T.S.H. Teo, 1994. Facilitators and inhibitors for strategic use of information technology. Inform. Manage., 27: 71-87.

Laudon, D.P. and J.P. Laudon, 1991. Business Information System: A Problem Solving Approach. College Publishers, New York, ISBN: 9780030304538, Pages: 631.

Lichtenberg, F., 1995. The output contributions of computer equipment and personnel: A firm-level analysis. Econ. Innov. New Technol., 3: 201-218.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Lichtenberg, F., 1996. The output contributions of computer equipment and personnel: A firm-level analysis. National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) Working Paper No. 4540. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=249505.

Loveman, G.W., 1994. An Assessment of the Productivity Impact of Information Technologies. In: Information Technology and the Corporation of the 1990: Research Studies, Allen, T. and M.M.S. Scott (Eds.). Oxford University Press, London, pp: 84-110.

Melville, N., K. Kraemer and V. Gurbaxani, 2004. Review: Information technology and organizational performance: An integrative model of IT business value. Manage. Inform. Syst. Quart., 28: 283-322.
Direct Link  |  

OECD, 2003. IT and economic growth: Evidence from OECD countries, factories and firms. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris, France.

Porter, M.E. and V.E. Millar, 1985. How information gives you competitive advantage. Harvard Bus. Rev., 63: 149-160.
Direct Link  |  

Roach, S.S., 1987. America's Technology Dilemma: A Profile of the Information Economy. Morgan Stanley, New York, USA., Pages: 29.