References

Adam, B., 1983. In Search of the Best Strains. 2nd Edn., Northern Bee Books, Hebden Bride, UK., ISBN: 9780907908067, pp: 206.

Akyol, E. and O. Kaftanoglu, 2001. Colony characteristics and the performance of Caucasian Apis mellifera caucasica and Mugla Apis mellifera anatoliaca bees and their reciprocal crosses. J. Apicult. Res., 40: 11-15.

Arslan, S., A. Guler and H.M. Cam, 2004. Determination of the wintering ability and comb honey yield of the different honey bee Apis mellifera L.) genotypes in Tokat region. J. Agric. Fac. Gaziosmanpasa Univ., 21: 85-90.

Bacandritsos, N., C. Saitanis and I. Papanastasio, 2004. Morphology and life cycle of Marchalina hellenica (Gennadius) (Hemiptera: Margarodidae) on pine (Parnis Mt.) and fir (Helmos Mt.) forests of Greece. Ann. Soc. Entomol. Fr., 40: 169-176.
Direct Link  |  

Cale, G.H. and J.W. Goven, 1956. Heterozis in the honeybee (A. mellifera L.). Genetics, pp: 292-303.

Dodologlu, A. and F. Genc, 2002. Some physiological characteristics of Caucasian and Anatolian honeybee (Apis mellifera L.) races and their crossbreeds. Turk. J. Vet. Anim. Sci., 26: 715-722.
Direct Link  |  

Dogaroglu, M. and E. Pekel, 1982. A comparative performance study of the best important Turkish bee races and types under cukurova conditions. Ann. CU Agric. Fac., 13: 46-60.

Dogaroglu, M., M. Ozdemir and C. Polat, 1992. Comparisons on performance of important Turkish honeybee A. mellifera races and eco-types in the Thrace region. Turk. J. Vet. Anim. Sci., 16: 403-414.

Firatli, C. and M.E. Budak, 1994. Determination the physiological, morphological and behavioral characteristic of some honeybee (Apis mellifera L.) colonies constituted with queen reared in various apiaries in Turkey. J. Agric. Sci., 771: 16-16.

Fresnaye, J. and Y. Lensky, 1961. Methods appreciation des surfaces de vain dans les colonies abeilles. Ann. Abeille, 4: 369-376.

Genc, F., C. Dulger, A. Dodologlu and S. Kutluca, 1999. Comparision of some physiological characters of caucasian, central anatolian and erzurum honeybee (Apis mellifera L.) Genotypes in the conditions of erzurum. Turk. J. Vet. Anim. Sci., 23: 645-650.
Direct Link  |  

Gencer, H.V. and M. Karacaoglu, 2003. The brood rearing activities and honey productions of caucasian race Apis mellifera caucasica and reciprocal crosses of caucasian and aegean ecotype of anatolian honey bee Apis mellifera anatoliaca in aegean conditions. J. Agric. Sci., 13: 61-65.
Direct Link  |  

Gencer, H.V., 1996. An investigation on the structural and behavioral characteristics of central Anatolian honeybee (Apis mellifera anatoliaca) ecotypes and their crosses. Ph.D. Thesis, Ankara University, Ankara, pp: 123.

Gul, A. and N. Sahinler, 2004. A study of comparison of Mugla (Apis mellifera anatolica), Italian (Apis mellifera ligustica) and Carniolan (Apis mellifera carnica) bee genotypes in the Hatay region with respect to their physiological characteristics. Proceedings of the 1st European Conference of Apidology, Sept. 19-23, Udine, Italy, pp: 1-8.

Guler, A. and O. Kaftanoglu, 1999. Determination of performances some important races and ecotypes of Turkish honeybees (Apis mellifera L.) under migratory beekeeping conditions. Turk. J. Vet. Anim. Sci., 23: 577-582.
Direct Link  |  

Guler, A., 1999. The study on morphological and physiological characters affecting the productivity of some honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) Genotypes of Turkey. Turk. J. Vet. Anim. Sci., 23: 393-400.
Direct Link  |  

Gurel, F., 1995. The Morphological characters of honeybees (Apis mellifera L.) raised in some queen rearing station and the possibilities of breeding hybrid parent lines. Ph.D. Thesis, Akdeniz University, Antalya, pp: 115.

Kaftanoglu, O., U. Kumova and Y. Bek, 1993. Determining the performance of different honeybee (A. mellifera L.) Univ. Cukurova Agric. Fac. Publ., 63: 23-23.

Laidlaw, H.H., 1979. Contemporary Queen Rearing. Dadant and Sons, Hamilton, Illinois, USA., ISBN: 0-915698-064, pp: 199.

Pankiw, T. and R.E. Page, Jr., 2001. Genotype and colony environment affect honeybee (Apis mellifera L.) development and foraging behavior. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 51: 87-94.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |