Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences

Year: 2017
Volume: 12
Issue: 11
Page No. 2901 - 2903

Comparative Analysis between Psychosocial Risk Assessment Models

Authors : Amelec Viloria, Nunziatina Bucci and Marisabel Luna

References

ISTAS., 2013. [Bonus training: A tool to use]. Instituto Sindical de Trabajo, Ambiente y Salud, Madrid, Spain. (In Spanish) http://www.istas.net/web/subportada_5.asp.

Kristensen, T., 2000. A new tool for assessing psychosocial factors at work: The copenhagen psychosocial questionnaire. The National Research Center for Work Environment, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Peiro, J.M. and I. Rodriguez, 2008. [Work stress, leadership and organizational health (In Spanish)]. Psychologist Pap., 29: 68-82.

Peluso, N.B. and L.M. Cardoso, 2015. [Psychosocial risk assessment model determined by internal, individual, double presence and external factors for work environments (In Spanish)]. REDIP. Digital J. Res. Postgraduate, 5: 615-635.
Direct Link  |  

Vega, S., 2003. NTP 603: Psychosocial risk, the demand-control-social support model (I). The National Research Center for Work Environment, Copenhagen, Denmark. (In Spanish)

Villalobos, G., A. Vargas, J. Escobar, M. Jimenez and M. Rondon, 2010. Instrument cluster for the evaluation of psychosocial risk factors. Master Thesis, Pontifical Xavierian University, Bogota, Colombia.

Viloria, A., C. Vasquez and M. Nunez, 2009. [Proposal of a mechanism of measurement of the variables that affect the efficiency of the public institutions in charge of generating social welfare: Case Venezuela (In Spanish)]. Univ. Sci. Technol., 13: 239-249.

WHO., 2007. Commission on social determinants of health: A conceptual framework for action on the social determinants of health. World Health Organization, Geneve, Switzerland. http://www.who.int/social_determinants/resources/csdh_framework_action_05_07.pdf

Design and power by Medwell Web Development Team. © Medwell Publishing 2024 All Rights Reserved