Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences
Year:
2017
Volume:
12
Issue:
6 SI
Page No.
7755 - 7758
References
Cidon, I., A. Gupta, R. Rom and C. Schuba, 1999. Hybrid TCP-UDP transport for Web traffic. Sun Microsystems, Mountain View, California. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=974975
Comer, D.E., 2000. Internetworking with TCP/IP. 4th Edn., Prentice Hall, New Jersey, USA.,.
Forouzan, B.A. and S.C. Fegan, 2010. TCP-IP Protocol Suite. McGraw-Hill Education, New York, USA., ISBN:9780256241662, Pages: 836.
GGNPC., 2008. UDP vs. TCP: Which protocol is best for games?. Gaffer On Games, Network Protocol Company, Santa Monica, California. https://gafferongames.com/post/udp_vs_tcp/.
Hashemi, S.M., 2015. Performance evaluation of network-on-chip routing deterministic and adaptive algorithms. Intl. J. Comput. Sci. Netw. Solutions, 3: 21-25.
Direct Link | Hassan, A.H.M., E.I.M. Zayid, M.A. Awad, A.S. Mohammed and S.T. Hassan, 2015. Performance evaluation of QOS in WIMAX network. Comput. Appl. Intl. J., 2: 15-23.
CrossRef | Direct Link | Mahmood, A.N., C. Leckie, J. Hu, Z. Tari and M. Atiquzzaman, 2010. Network Traffic Analysis and SCADA Security. In: Handbook of Information and Communication Security, Stavroulakis, P. and M. Stamp (Eds.). Springer, Berlin, Germany, ISBN:978-3-642-04116-7, pp: 383-405.
Narayan, S., 2014. Improving network performance: An evaluation of TCP-UDP on networks. MS Thesis, Unitec Institute of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand.
Sugeng, W., J.E. Istiyanto, K. Mustofa and A. Ashari, 2015. The impact of QoS changes towards network performance. Intl. J. Comput. Netw. Commun. Secur., 3: 48-53.
Direct Link | Yadav, S. and V. Bansal, 2014. Hybrid TCP-IP and UDP: A review article. Intl. J. Adv. Res. Comput. Sci. Software Eng., 4: 953-957.
Direct Link | Yadav, S., S. Yogi and R. Yadav, 2014. Proxy server for Hybrid TCP-IP and UDP. Intl. J. Comput. Sci. Mobile Comput., 3: 825-829.
Direct Link |