References

Anderson, T.R., K.J. Schonborn, L. Du Plessis, A.S. Gupthar and T.L. Hull, 2013. Identifying and Developing Students’ Ability to Reason with Concepts and Representations in Biology. In: Multiple Representations in Biological Education, Treagust, D.F. and C.Y. Tsui (Eds.). Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands, ISBN:978-94-007-4191-1, pp: 19-38.

Assaraf, O.B.Z. and N. Orion, 2009. A design based research of an earth systems based environmental curriculum. Eurasia J. Math. Sci. Technol. Educ., 5: 47-62.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Batzri, O., O.B.Z. Assaraf, C. Cohen and N. Orion, 2015. Understanding the earth systems: Expressions of dynamic and cyclic thinking among university students. J. Sci. Educ. Technol., 24: 761-775.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Ben-zvi-Assarf, O. and N. Orion, 2005. Development of system thinking skills in the context of earth system education. J. Res. Sci. Teach., 42: 518-560.
Direct Link  |  

Boersma, K.T. and A.J. Waarlo, 2003. Systems thinking as a metacognitive tool for students, teachers and curriculum developers. Proceedings of the ESERA 2003 Conference on research and quality in science education, August 19-23, 2003, Universiteit Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands, pp: 1-15.

Campbell, N.A., J.B. Reece, L.A. Urry, M.L. Cain and S.A. Wasserman et al., 2008. Biology. 8th Edn., Benjamin Cummings, San Francisco, California, USA., ISBN-13:978-0805368444, Pages: 1393.

Collins, A., 2011. Representational Competence: A Commentary on the Greeno Analysis of Classroom Practice. In: Theories of Learning and Studies of Instructional Practice, Koschmann, T. (Ed.). Springer, New York, USA., ISBN: 978-1-4419-7581-2, pp: 105-111.

Durmaz, H. and S. Mutlu, 2017. The effect of an instructional intervention on elementary students' science process skills. J. Educ. Res., 110: 433-445.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Eilam, B. and D. Reisfeld, 2017. A curriculum unit for promoting complex system thinking: The case of combined system dynamics and agent based models for population growth. J. Adv. Educ. Res., 2: 39-60.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Eilam, B., 2012. System thinking and feeding relations: Learning with a live ecosystem model. Instructional Sci., 40: 213-239.
Direct Link  |  

Harlen, W., 1985. Teaching and Learning Primary Science. Teachers College Press, New York, USA., Pages: 255.

Hashem, K. and D. Mioduser, 2011. The contribution of Learning by Modeling (LbM) to students' understanding of complexity concepts. Intl. J. E. Educ. Bus. Manage. Learn., 1: 151-157.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Hmelo-Silver, C.E. and R. Azevedo, 2006. Understanding complex systems: Some core challenges. J. Learn. Sci., 15: 53-61.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Hokayem, H. and A.W. Gotwals, 2016. Early elementary students’ understanding of complex ecosystems: A learning progression approach. J. Res. Sci. Teach., 53: 1524-1545.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Lee, T.D., M.G. Jones and K. Chesnutt, 2017. Teaching systems thinking in the context of the water cycle. Res. Sci. Educ., 47: 1-36.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

MacLeod, M. and N.J. Nersessian, 2015. Modeling systems-level dynamics: Understanding without mechanistic explanation in integrative systems Biology. Stud. Hist. Philosophy Part C. Biol. Biomed. Sci., 49: 1-11.
CrossRef  |  PubMed  |  Direct Link  |  

Monroe, M.C., R.R. Plate and L. Colley, 2015. Assessing an introduction to systems thinking. Nat. Sci. Educ., 44: 11-17.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Nichols, K., J. Hanan and M. Ranasinghe, 2013. Transforming the social practices of learning with representations: A study of disciplinary discourse. Res. Sci. Educ., 43: 179-208.
Direct Link  |  

Plate, R., 2010. Assessing individuals' understanding of nonlinear causal structures in complex systems. Syst. Dyn. Rev., 26: 19-33.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Quillin, K. and S. Thomas, 2015. Drawing-to-learn: A framework for using drawings to promote model-based reasoning in Biology. CBE. Life Sci. Educ., 14: 1-16.
CrossRef  |  PubMed  |  Direct Link  |  

Sommer, C. and M. Lucken, 2010. System competence-are elementary students able to deal with a biological system?. Nord. Stud. Sci. Educ., 6: 125-143.
Direct Link  |  

Sumarno, S., M. Ibrahim and Z.I. Supardi, 2016. Validity of Multiple Representation Supported Argumentation (MRSA) learning model to treat complex system reasoning ability. Intl. Conf. Math. Sci. Educ., 3: B-54-B-60.
Direct Link  |  

Tripto, J., O.B.Z. Assaraf and M. Amit, 2013. Mapping what they know: Concept maps as an effective tool for assessing students’ systems thinking. Am. J. Oper. Res., 3: 245-258.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Trujillo, C.M., T.R. Anderson and N.J. Pelaez, 2016. Exploring the MACH model’s potential as a metacognitive tool to help undergraduate students monitor their explanations of biological mechanisms. CBE. Life Sci. Educ., 15: 1-16.
PubMed  |  Direct Link  |  

Tsingos-Lucas, C., S. Bosnic-Anticevich, C.R. Schneider and L. Smith, 2016. The effect of reflective activities on reflective thinking ability in an undergraduate pharmacy curriculum. Am. J. Pharm. Educ., 80: 1-12.
CrossRef  |  PubMed  |  Direct Link  |  

Verhoeff, R.P., A.J. Waarlo and K.T. Boersma, 2008. Systems modelling and the development of coherent understanding of cell Biology. Intl. J. Sci. Educ., 30: 543-568.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Verhoeff, R.P., K.T. Boersma and A.J. Waarlo, 2013. Multiple Representations in Modeling Strategies for the Development of Systems Thinking in Biology Education. In: Multiple Representations in Biological Education, Treagust, D.F. and C.Y. Tsu (Eds.). Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands, ISBN:978-94-007-4191-1, pp: 331-348.

Westra, R.H.V., 2008. Learning and Teaching Ecosystem Behaviour in Secondary Education: Systems Thinking and Modelling in Authentic Practices. Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands, Pages: 268.