References

Ahmad, I.M., M.H. Hesham-El-Naggar and A. Naeem-Khan, 2007. Artificial neural network application to estimate kinematic soil pile interaction response parameters. Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng., 27: 892-905.
CrossRef  |  

Aziz, A.R.A. and K.F.V. Wong, 1992. A neural network approach to the determination of aquifer parameters. Groundwater, 30: 164-166.
Direct Link  |  

Chang, C.T. and R.J. Chao, 2006. Application of back-propagation networks in debris flow prediction. Eng. Geol., 85: 270-280.
CrossRef  |  

Dixon, B., 2005. Applicability of neuro-fuzzy techniques in predicting ground-water vulnerability: A GIS-based sensitivity analysis. J. Hydrol., 309: 17-38.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Golden Software, 2002. Surfer for Windows. Version 8, Golden Software Inc., Golden, Co., USA.

Haykin, S., 1999. Neural Networks, A Comprehensive Foundation. 2nd Edn., Prentice Hall, New Jersey, USA., ISBN-13: 9788120323735.

Heuvelink, G.B.M. and R. Webster, 2001. Modelling soil variation: Past, present and future. Geoderma, 100: 269-301.
CrossRef  |  

Holger, R.M. and G.C. Dandy, 1996. The use of artificial neural networks for the prediction of water quality parameters. Water Resour. Res., 32: 1013-1022.

Islam N., W.W. Wallender, J.P. Mitchell, S. Wicks and R.E. Howitt, 2006. Performance evaluation of methods for the estimation of soil hydraulic parameters and their suitability in a hydrologic model. Geoderma, 134: 135-151.
CrossRef  |  

Jain, A. and L.E. Ormsbee, 2004. An evaluation of the available techniques for estimating missing fecal coliform data. J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 40: 1617-1630.
CrossRef  |  

Merdum, H., O. Cinar, R. Meral and M. Apan, 2006. Comparison of artificial neural network and regression pedotransfer functions for prediction of soil water retention and saturated hydraulic conductivity. Soil Till Res., 90: 108-116.
CrossRef  |  

Richards, L.A., 1954. Diagnosis and Improvement of Saline and Alkaline Soils. US Gov. Print. Office, Washington, DC., USA., pp: 160.

Rogers, S.J., H.C. Chen, D.C. Kopaska-Merkel and J.H. Fang, 1995. Predicting permeability from porosity using artificial neural networks. AAPG Bull., 79: 1786-1797.
Direct Link  |  

Salam, M.A., S.M. Al-Alawi and A.A. Maqrashi, 2006. An artificial neural networks approach to model and predict the relationship between the grounding resistance and length of buried electrode in the soil. J. Electrostat., 64: 338-342.
CrossRef  |  

Schaap, M.G., F.J. Leij and M.T. van Genuchten, 1998. Neural network analysis for hierarchical prediction of soil hydraulic properties. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 62: 847-855.
Direct Link  |  

StatSoft Inc., 2000. STATISTICA (data analysis software system). Version 6, StatSoft Inc., Tulsa, OK., USA.

Sudheer, K.P. and A. Jain, 2004. Explaining the internal behavior of artificial neural network river flow models. Hydrol. Process., 118: 833-844.
CrossRef  |  

Tamari, S., J.H.M. Wosten and J.C. Ruiz-Suarez, 1996. Testing an artificial neural network for predicting soil hydraulic conductivity. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 57: 1088-1095.
Direct Link  |  

Trippi, R.R. and E. Turban, 1996. Neural Networks in Finance and Investing Using Artificial Intelligence to Improve Real World Performance. McGraw-Hill, New York, USA.

Warrick, A.W. and D.R. Nielson, 1980. Spatial Variability of Soil Physical Properties in the Field. In: Applications in Soil Physics, Hillel, D. (Ed.). Academic Press, New York, USA., pp: 319-324.

Warrick, A.W., 1998. Spatial Variability. In: Environmental Soil Physics, Hillel, D. (Ed.). Academic Press, New York, USA., pp: 655-675.

Wilby, R.L., R.J. Abrahart and C.W. Dawson, 2003. Detection of conceptual model rainfall-runoff processes inside an artificial neural network. Hydrol. Sci. J., 48: 163-181.
Direct Link  |  

Woldt, W., I. Dahab, C. Bogardi and C. Dou, 1996. Management of diffuse pollution in groundwater under imprecise conditions using fuzzy models. Water Sci. Technol., 33: 249-257.
CrossRef  |