Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences

Year: 2011
Volume: 6
Issue: 1
Page No. 58 - 63

A Study of Dynamic Characterizations of GaAs/AlGaAs Self-Assembled Quantum Dot Lasers

Authors : H. Arabshahi, M. Rezaee Rokn-Abadi and D. Ghodsi Nahri

Abstract: In this research, we have solved the rate equations for GaAs/AlGaAs self-assembled quantum dot laser with considering the homogeneous and inhomogeneous broadening of the optical gain using 4th order Runge-Kutta method. With increasing the Full Width at Half Maximum (FWHM) of homogeneous broadening, the threshold current, turn-on delay and steady-state photons increase because of increasing the density of states in the central group. The calculation results show also that the simulated self-assembled dot laser reaches the steady-state faster and the lasing emission is not single mode due to the gain saturation.

How to cite this article:

H. Arabshahi, M. Rezaee Rokn-Abadi and D. Ghodsi Nahri, 2011. A Study of Dynamic Characterizations of GaAs/AlGaAs Self-Assembled Quantum Dot Lasers. Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 6: 58-63.

INTRODUCTION

Broadband light-emitting devices such as Super Luminescent Diodes (SLDs) and external cavity tunable lasers are ideal optical sources for applications in many areas. For example, SLDs can be used in the fields of Optical Cherence Tomography (OCT), Fiber-Optic Gyroscope (FOG) and Wavelength-Division-Multiplexing (WDM) system while external cavity tunable lasers are used in the fields of optical spectroscopy, biomedical, metrology and Dense Wavelength Division Multiplexing (DWDM).

It was proposed that the characteristic of size inhomogeneity naturally occurred in self-assembled Quantum Dots (QDs) grown by Stranski-Krastanow (SK) mode is beneficial to broadening the material gain spectra (Sun et al., 1999). Broadband emitting QD-SLDs and broadband tuning external cavity tunable lasers with QD gain devices have been studied (Zhang et al., 2004, 2008; Liu et al., 2005; Lv et al., 2008; Sugawara et al., 2000). Here, we present results in broadband emitting QD material laser. These GaAs/AlGaAs QDs exhibit a broad Photoluminescence (PL) Full Width at Half Maximum (FWHM) of 158 nm which is much wider than that grown on GaAs buffer (Lv et al., 2008; Sugawara et al., 2000). The short migration length of gallium atoms on AlGaAs surface increases the size dispersion of GaAs QDs resulting in the broadening of optical spectrum. By optimizing the GaAs spacer thickness of multi-stacked GaAs/AlGaAs QDs, over 150 nm PL FWHM is achieved. In this study, considering the homogeneous and inhomogeneous broadening of the optical gain we have solved the rate equations numerically using 4th order Runge-Kutta method and analyze the dynamics characteristics of GaAs/AlGaAs SAQD-LDs (Tan et al., 2007, 2008).

We have shown that considering the nonlinear gain result in the dynamic characteristic of photons number at the FWHM of homogeneous broadening comparable near or equal to the FWHM of inhomogeneous broadening reaches the steady-state faster. The dynamics characteristics such as maximum of the relaxation oscillation magnitude, turn-on delay, relaxation oscillation frequency and modulation bandwidth are improved as the current is increased.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Linear and nonlinear optical gain: Based on the density-matrix theory, the linear optical gain of QD active region is given as:

(1)

Where:

nr = The refractive index
ND = The volume density of Qds
|Pσcv|2 = The transition matrix element
fc = The electron occupation function of the conduction-band discrete state
fv = That of the valence-band discrete state
Ecv = The interband transition energy

The linear optical gain shows the homogeneous broadening of a Lorentz shape as:

(2)

Where, FWHM is given as 2ħΓcv with polarization dephasing or scattering rate Γcv. Neglecting the optical-field polarization dependence, the transition matrix element is given as:

(3)

where, Icv represents the overlap integral between the envelope functions of an electron and a hole:

(4)

Where:

k.p = The interaction between the conduction band and valence band
Eg = The band gap
me* = The electron effective mass
Eg = The spin-orbit interaction energy of the QD material

Equation 3 holds as long as we consider QDs with a nearly symmetrical shape (Markus et al., 2003; Grundmann, 2002; Sugawara et al., 1997). In actual SAQD-LDs, we should rewrite the linear optical gain formula of Eq. 1 by taking into account inhomogeneous broadening due to the QD size and composition fluctuation in terms of a convolution integral as:

(5)

Where:

Ecv = The center of the energy distribution function of each interband transition
fc (Ec) = The electron occupation function of the conduction-band discrete state of the QDs with the interband transition energy of Ec and
fv (Ev) = That of the valence band discrete state

The energy fluctuation of Qds are represented by G(Ec-Ecv) that takes a Gaussian distribution function as:

(6)

Whose, FWHM is given by Γ0 = 2.35ξ0. The width Γ0 usually depends on the band index c and v (Lv et al., 2008).

Rate equations: The most popular and useful way to deal with carrier and photon dynamics in lasers is to solve rate equations for carrier and photons (Grundmann, 2002; Sugawara et al., 1997; Sugawara, 1995; Coldren, 1995). We consider an electron and a hole as an exciton thus, the relaxation means the process that both an electron and a hole relax into the ground state simultaneously to form an exciton.

We assume that only a single discrete electron and hole ground state is formed inside the QD and the charge neutrality always holds in each QD. In order to describe the interaction between the QDs with different resonant energies through photons, we divide the QD ensemble into j = 1, 2, ..., 2M+1 groups depending on their resonant energy for the interband transition over the longitudinal cavity photon modes. J = M corresponds to the group and mode at Ecv.

We take the energy width of each group equal to the mode separation of the longitudinal cavity photon modes which equals to:

(7)

Where, Lca is the cavity length. The energy of the jth QDs group is represented by:

(8)

Where, j = 1, 2, .... ,2M+1. The QD density jth QDs group is given as:

(9)

Let Nj be the carrier number in jth QDs group, according to Pauli’s exclusion principle, the occupation probability in the ground state of the jth QDs group is defined as:

(10)

The rate equations are as follows (Liu et al., 2005; Lv et al., 2008; Sugawara et al., 2000; Tan et al., 2008):

(11)

Where:

Ns, Nw and Nj = The carrier number in Separate Confinement Heterostructure (SCH) layer, Wetting Layer (WL) and jth QDs group, respectively
Sm = The photon number of mth mode where m = 1, 2…2M+1
I = The injected current
Gj = The fraction of the jth QDs group type within an ensemble of different dot size populations
e = The electron charge
Dg = The degeneracy of the QD ground state without spin
β = The spontaneous-emission coupling efficiency to the lasing mode
gmj(1) = The linear optical gain which the jth QDs group gives to the mth mode photons where is represented by:
(12)

The related time constants are as: τs is diffusion in the SCH region; τsr is carrier recombination in the SCH region; τwe is carrier reexcitation from the WL to the SCH region; τwr is carrier recombination in the WL; τdj is carrier relaxation into the jth QDs group; τr is carrier recombination in the Qds and τp is photon lifetime in the cavity. The average carrier relaxation lifetime is given as:

(13)

Where, τ0 is the initial carrier relaxation lifetime. The photon lifetime in the cavity is:

(14)

Where, R1 and R2 are the cavity mirror reflectivity and αi is the internal loss. The laser output power of the mth mode from one cavity mirror is given as:

(15)

Where, wm is the emitted photon frequency and R is R1 or R2. We solved the rate equations numerically using fourth order Runge-Kutta method (Sugawara, 1995; Coldren, 1995; Chuang, 1995) to obtain the carrier and photon characteristics and modulation response by supplying the steplike current at time t = 0. The system reaches the steady-state after the relaxation oscillation. We assume that all the carriers are injected into the WL, i.e., τsr = τwe = ∞ and consider the thermal carrier escape time τe = ∞.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

We have solved the rate Eq. 11 using numeric method of Runge-Kutta without considering the nonlinear gain and thermal carrier escape from QDs and simulated the carrier and photon characteristics.

As shown in Fig. 1 with increasing the injection current, turn on delay decreases and maximum of the relaxation oscillation magnitude and relaxation oscillation frequency increase. Maximum of the relaxation oscillation magnitude increases and relaxation oscillation frequency decreases for the larger FWHM of homogeneous broadening.

As shown in Fig. 2a-d, the steady-state photons are increased as the injection current is increased. This is because of increasing the injection current the carriers of QDs increase that result in increasing the cavity lasing photons, these increased photons that we call them early photons lead to increasing the stimulated emission rate as a result, the QDs carriers decrease and the lasing photons increase at the new steady-state.


Fig. 1: Simulation results of carrier characteristics for different injection current of 1.5, 2, 2.5, 5 and 10 mA at the FWHM of homogeneous broadenings for ħγcv = 10 meV

Fig. 2: Simulation results of photon characteristics for different injection currents I = 2, 2.5, 5 and 10 mA when the FWHM of homogeneous broadening is 3, 5, 7 and 10 meV

With increasing the injection current turn on delay decreases, this occur because the required carriers for start of the relaxation oscillation supply earlier.


Fig. 3: Photon-characteristics for I = 2 mA at a) ħγcv= 7, 7.5, 8.5 and 10 meV; b) ħγcv= 0.1, 1, 3, 5 and 7 meV

Relaxation oscillation frequency and maximum of the relaxation oscillation magnitude also enhance further increment of early photons lead to further increment of maximum of the relaxation oscillation magnitude. On the other side, increasing the stimulated emission rate leads to the rather light amplification and decreasing the cavity photons time as a result the relaxation oscillation frequency increases and the laser reaches the steady state earlier.

As the FWHM of homogeneous broadening increases from c to f, turn on delay increases because density of states of the central group increase as a result the required carriers for start of lasing increase and supply slower. Steady-state photons except to Fig. 2c at the current I = 2.5 mA increases due to increasing the Qds within the homogeneous broadening of the central mode. Enhancing of the homogeneous broadening until special value for the specific current (for example, in Fig. 3a, b, until ħγcv = 3 meV for I = 2 mA leads to increasing of maximum of the relaxation oscillation magnitude and the steady-state photons because the central group DOS and thus the central group carriers enhance. Further elevating of the homogeneous broadening results in heightening of the empty DOS at the central group (decreasing of the population inversion) and slaking of maximum of the relaxation oscillation magnitude and the steady-state photons.


Fig. 4: Other illustration from photon-characteristics for different injection currents I = 2, 2.5, 5 and 10 mA at; a) ħγcv = 3meV; b) 5 meV; c) 7 meV and d) 10 meV

As shown at injection current I = 2 mA with increasing of the FWHM of homogeneous broadening from 6 meV, the population inversion is provided at the higher current and the threshold current elevates. As shown in Fig. 4a, the steady-state photons at I = 2.5 mA are <I = 2 mA.

Lasing photons at I = 5 and 10 mA do not reach the steady state after 80 and 40 ns. As it is shown in Fig. 4b, the lasing photons at I = 5 and 10 mA decrease as the time increases and they become lesser than that of I = 2 mA after 45 ns, they do not reach the steady-state after 80 ns.

Lasing photons at 10 mA become lesser than that of 5 mA after 30 ns. Lasing photons at I = 2.5 mA increase as the time enhances and they do not reach the steady-state after 100 ns. As it is shown in Fig. 4c, the lasing photons at I = 2.5 mA reach the steady-state after 80 ns but the lasing photons at I = 5 and 10 mA do not reach the steady-state and they elevate as the time increases. As it is shown in Fig. 4d, the lasing photons at I = 5 and 10 mA do not reach the steady-state after 300 ns. These non steady-states are due to not considering of gain saturation effect.

CONCLUSION

Self-assembled Quantum Dots (QDs) with broadband emitting spectra, QD Super Luminescent Diodes (SLDs) and external cavity tunable QD laser have been studied. Considering the homogeneous and inhomogeneous broadening of the optical gain without and with considering the nonlinear gain and thermal carrier escape from QDs, we have solved the rate equations numerically using fourth order Runge-Kutta method and analyzed the dynamic characteristics of GaAs/AlGaAs SAQD-LDs. Dynamic characteristics and steady-state photons improve as the current increases.

Considering the nonlinear gain results in improvement of simulation results of the dynamic characteristics of GaAs/AlGaAs SAQD-LD at the FWHM of homogeneous broadening comparable near and equal to the FWHM of inhomogeneous broadening. In this case, the SAQD-LD reaches the steady-state faster and the lasing emission is not single mode due to the gain saturation.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

This research is supported by the Ferdowsi University of Mashhad through a contract with Vice President for Research and Technology.

Design and power by Medwell Web Development Team. © Medwell Publishing 2024 All Rights Reserved