Asian Journal of Information Technology

Year: 2017
Volume: 16
Issue: 8
Page No. 667 - 674

Issues Affecting e-Learning Practices at North-West University, Mafikeng Campus

Authors : Sylvia Tumelo Nthutang and Nehemiah Mavetera


Al-Harbi, K.A.S., 2011. E-Learning in the Saudi tertiary education: Potential and challenges. Applied Comp. Inf., 9: 31-46.
CrossRef  |  

Benigno, V. and G. Trentin, 2000. The evaluation of online courses. J. Comput. Assisted Learn., 16: 259-270.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Benson, A., C. Lawler and A. Whitworth, 2008. Rules, roles and tools: Activity theory and the comparative study of E‐learning. Br. J. Educ. Technol., 39: 456-467.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Bhattacherjee, A., 2012. Social Science Research: Principles, Methods and Practices. 2nd Edn., CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform, New York, USA., ISBN:9781475146127, Pages: 149.

Blin, F. and M. Munro, 2008. Why hasn’t technology disrupted academics’ teaching practices? Understanding resistance to change through the lens of activity theory. Comput. Educ., 50: 475-490.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Conole, C., 2004. E-learning: The hype and the reality. J. Interactive Media Educ., 12: 1-18.
Direct Link  |  

Creswell, J.W., 2008. Research Design Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches. 3rd Edn., Sage Publications, London, England, UK., ISBN:978-1-4129-6556-9, Pages: 265.

Ellaway, R. and K. Masters, 2008. AMEE guide 32: E-learning in medical education Part 1; Learning, teaching and assessment. Med. Teacher, 30: 455-473.
CrossRef  |  PubMed  |  Direct Link  |  

Freund, Y.P., 1988. Critical success factors. Plann. Rev., 16: 20-23.
Direct Link  |  

Kahiigi, K.E., L. Ekenberg, H. Hansson, F.F. Tusubira and M. Danielson, 2008. Exploring the E-learning state of art. Electron. J. E Learn., 6: 77-88.
Direct Link  |  

Khan, B.H., 2005. Managing E-Learning: Design, Delivery, Implementation and Evaluation. IGI Global, London, England, ISBN:1-59140-636-6, Pages: 425.

Lee, B.C., J.O. Yoon and I. Lee, 2009. Learners’ acceptance of E-learning in South Korea: Theories and results. Comput. Educ., 53: 1320-1329.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Liaw, S.S., H.M. Huang and G.D. Chen, 2007. Surveying instructor and learner attitudes toward E-learning. Comput. Educ., 49: 1066-1080.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Mahdizadeh, H., H. Biemans and M. Mulder, 2008. Determining factors of the use of e-learning environments by university teachers. Comput. Edu., 51: 142-154.
CrossRef  |  

Morrison, J.L. and B.H. Khan, 2003. The global E-learning framework: An interview with Badrul Khan. MSc Thesis, University of North Carolina, Hapel Hill, North Carolina.

Murphy, E. and M.A. Rodriguez-Manzanares, 2008. Using activity theory and its principle of contradictions to guide research in educational technology. Aust. J. Educ. Technol., 24: 442-457.
Direct Link  |  

Nenty, H.J., 2009. Writing a quantitative research thesis. Intl. J. Educ. Sci., 1: 19-32.

Payne, G. and J. Payne, 2004. Key Concepts in Social Research. Sage Publication, London.

Punch, K.F., 2005. Introduction to Social Research: Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches. 2nd Edn., Sage Publications, London, England, UK., Pages: 320.

Selim, H.M., 2007. Critical success factors for e-learning acceptance: Confirmatory factor models. Comput. Educ., 49: 396-413.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Sun, P., R. Tsai, G. Finger, Y. Chen and D. Yeh, 2008. What drives a successful e-learning? An empirical investigation of the critical factors influencing learner satisfaction. Comput. Educ., 50: 1183-1202.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Design and power by Medwell Web Development Team. © Medwell Publishing 2022 All Rights Reserved