Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences

Year: 2019
Volume: 14
Issue: 10
Page No. 3316 - 3321

Multimedia Interactive Whiteboard (MIW) System in Technical Drawing in Nigeria: A Perception

Authors : Godwin Keres Okereke, Chibueze Tobias Orji and Hyginus Osita Omeje

References

Al-Saleem, B.I.A., 2012. The interactive whiteboard in English as a Foreign Language (EFL) classroom. Eur. Sci. J., 8: 126-134.
Direct Link  |  

Alfaki, I.M. and A.H.A. Khamis, 2018. Difficulties facing teachers in using interactive whiteboards in their classes. Am. Intl. J. Soc. Sci., 3: 136-158.
Direct Link  |  

Anonymous, 2006. Teaching interactively with electronic whiteboards in the primary phase. BECTA, Millburn Hill Road, Canley, Coventry.

Ardichvili, A., 2008. Learning and knowledge sharing in virtual communities of practice: Motivators, barriers and enablers. Adv. Developing Hum. Resour., 10: 541-554.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Bacon, D., 2011. The interactive whiteboard as a force for pedagogic change. Inf. Technol. Educ. J., 1: 15-18.

Cuthell, J.P., 2003. Interactive whiteboards: New tools, new pedagogies, new learning. Some Views Pract., 1: 1-23.
Direct Link  |  

Faah, C.K., 2001. Freshman Geometrical and Engineering Drawing. Ebenezer Printing House, Mumbai, India,.

Higgins, S., C. Falzon, I. Hall, D. Moseley and F. Smith et al., 2005. Embedding ICT in the literacy and numeracy strategies. Master Thesis, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK.

Hunkins, F. and A.C. Ornstein, 1993. Curriculum: Foundations, Principles and Theory. 2nd Edn., Allyn and Bacon, Boston, Massachusetts, USA., ISBN:9780205141463, Pages: 416.

Jang, S.J. and M.F. Tsai, 2012. Reasons for using or not using interactive whiteboards: Perspectives of taiwanese elementary mathematics and science teachers. Australas. J. Educ. Technol., 28: 1451-1465.
Direct Link  |  

Javidi, S., A. Janfaza and A. Soori, 2014. Integration of smart boards in EFL classrooms. Intl. J. Educ. Literacy Stud., 2: 20-23.
Direct Link  |  

Lin, C.Y., 2012. How to use Low-Cost Devices as Teaching Materials for Children with Different Disabilities. In: Assistive Technologies, Auat, F. (Ed.). InTech, New York, USA., pp: 3-24.

Marzano, R.J. and M. Haystead, 2009. Final Report on the Evaluation of the Promethean Technology. Marzano Research Laboratory, Englewood, Colorado,.

Patel, C., 2013. Use of multimedia technology in teaching and learning communication skill: An analysis. Intl. J. Advancements Res. Technol., 2: 116-123.
Direct Link  |  

Sarsa, J. and R. Soler, 2011. Special features of interactive whiteboard software for motivating students. Intl. J. Inf. Educ. Technol., 1: 235-240.
Direct Link  |  

Schmid, E.C., 2008. Potential pedagogical benefits and drawbacks of multimedia use in the English language classroom equipped with interactive whiteboard technology. Comput. Educ., 51: 1553-1568.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Souhila, B. and M.M. Khadidja, 2013. We need change The interactive white board in the EFL context. Acad. J. Interdiscip. Stud., 2: 379-384.
Direct Link  |  

Tataroglu, B. and A. Erduran, 2010. Examining students attitudes and views towards usage an interactive whiteboard in mathematics lessons. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci., 2: 2533-2538.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Turel, Y.K. and C. Demirli, 2010. Instructional interactive whiteboard materials: Designers perspectives. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci., 9: 1437-1442.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Design and power by Medwell Web Development Team. © Medwell Publishing 2024 All Rights Reserved