Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences

Year: 2020
Volume: 15
Issue: 7
Page No. 1728 - 1736

Behavioral Patterns of Agents in the Transfer Processes of (Internet of Things) IoT Technologies in Agricultural Production Chains

Authors : William Alejandro Orjuela-Garzon and Santiago Quintero-Ramirez

References

Adnan, N., S.M. Nordin, I. Rahman and A. Noor, 2017. Adoption of green fertilizer technology among paddy farmers: A possible solution for Malaysian food security. Land Policy, 63: 38-52.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Adrian, A.M., S.H. Norwood and P.L. Mask, 2005. Producers' perceptions and attitudes toward precision agriculture technologies. Comput. Electron. Agric., 48: 256-271.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Ajzen, I., 2005. Attitudes, Personality and Behaviour. McGraw-Hill International, Pennsylvania, USA.,.

Al Hogail, A. and M. Al Shahrani, 2018. Building consumer trust to improve Internet of Things (IoT) technology adoption. Proceedings of the International Conference on Neuroergonomics and Cognitive Engineering (AHFE’18), July 21-25, 2018, Loews Sapphire Falls Resort at Universal Studios, Orlando, Florida, USA., pp: 325-334.

Bakhsh, M., A. Mahmood and N.A. Sangi, 2017. Examination of factors influencing students and faculty behavior towards m-learning acceptance: An empirical study. Int. J. Inf. Learn. Technol., 34: 166-188.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Carlsson, B. and R. Stankiewicz, 1991. On the nature, function and composition of technological systems. J. Evol. Econ., 1: 93-118.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Carlsson, B., 1994. Technological Systems and Economic Growth: Comparing Finland, Sweden, Japan, and the United States. In: Explaining Technical Change in a Small Country, Vuori, S. and P. Vuorinen (Eds.). Springer, Berlin, Germany, ISBN: 978-3-7908-0760-8, pp: 159-183.

Chandra, P., T. Bhattacharjee and B. Bhowmick, 2018. Does technology transfer training concern for agriculture output in India? A critical study on a lateritic zone in West Bengal. J. Agribusiness Developing Emerging Economies, 8: 339-362.
Direct Link  |  

Chehrehpak, M., A. Alirezaei and M. Farmani, 2012. Selecting of optimal methods for the technology transfer by using Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). Indian J. Sci. Technol., 5: 2540-2546.
Direct Link  |  

Chen, J., T. Hu, J.H. Wu, H.P. Si and K.Y. Lin, 2014. Applications of Internet of Things in Facility Agriculture. In: Applied Mechanics and Materials, Helen, Z., M. Han and X.J. Zhao (Eds.). Trans Tech Publications Inc., Zurich, Switzerland, pp: 517-523.

Chen, Y., 1995. Teaching material in technology transfer. Yuan Ze University Press, ‎Zhongli, Taoyuan City, Taiwan.

Davis, F.D., 1989. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quart., 13: 319-340.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Daxini, A., C. O’Donoghue, M. Ryan, C. Buckley, A.P. Barnes and K. Daly, 2018. Which factors influence farmer’s intentions to adopt nutrient management planning?. J. Environ. Manage., 224: 350-360.
CrossRef  |  PubMed  |  Direct Link  |  

Diaz‐Diaz, N.L., I. Aguiar‐Diaz and P.D. Saa‐Perez, 2006. Technological knowledge assets in industrial firms. R&D Manage., 36: 189-203.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Dinmohammadi, A. and M. Shafiee, 2017. Determination of the most suitable technology transfer strategy for wind turbines using an integrated AHP-TOPSIS decision model. Energies, Vol. 10, No. 5. 10.3390/en10050642

Duan, Y.P., C.X. Zhao and Z. Tian, 2014. Application of the Internet of Things Technology in Agriculture. In: Applied Mechanics and Materials, Lin, Z., H. Hu, Y. Zhang, J. Qiao and J. Xu (Eds.). Trans Tech Publications Inc., Zurich, Switzerland, pp: 2395-2398.

Far, S.T. and K. Rezaei-Moghaddam, 2017. Determinants of Iranian agricultural consultant’s intentions toward precision agriculture: Integrating innovativeness to the technology acceptance model. J. Saudi Soc. Agric. Sci., 16: 280-286.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Farooq, M.S., M. Salam, N. Jaafar, A. Fayolle, K. Ayupp, M. Radovic-Markovic and A. Sajid, 2017. Acceptance and use of Lecture Capture System (LCS) in executive business studies: Extending UTAUT2. Interact. Technol. Smart Educ., 14: 329-348.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Fishbein, M. and I Ajzen, 1975. Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA., USA., ISBN-13: 9780201020892, Pages: 480.

Gupta, K.P., P. Bhaskar and S. Singh, 2017. Prioritization of factors influencing employee adoption of e-government using the analytic hierarchy process. J. Syst. Inf. Technol., 19: 116-137.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Jayashankar, P., S. Nilakanta, W.J. Johnston, P. Gill and R. Burres, 2018. IoT adoption in agriculture: The role of trust, perceived value and risk. J. Bus. Ind. Marketing, 33: 804-821.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Kamal, M.M. and M. Alsudairi, 2009. Investigating the importance of factors influencing integration technologies adoption in local government authorities. Transforming Government People Process Policy, 3: 302-331.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Khabiri, N., S. Rast and A.A. Senin, 2012. Identifying main influential elements in technology transfer process: A conceptual model. Procedia Social Behav. Sci., 40: 417-423.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Kumar, S., S. Luthra and A. Haleem, 2015. Benchmarking supply chains by analyzing technology transfer critical barriers using AHP approach. Benchmarking Int. J., 22: 538-558.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Kumar, S., S. Luthra, A. Haleem, S.K. Mangla and D. Garg, 2015. Identification and evaluation of critical factors to technology transfer using AHP approach. Int. Strategic Manage. Rev., 3: 24-42.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Lai, W.H. and C.T. Tsai, 2009. Fuzzy rule-based analysis of firm`s technology transfer in Taiwan`s machinery industry. Expert Syst. Appl., 36: 12012-12022.
CrossRef  |  

Lai, W.H. and C.T. Tsai, 2010. Analyzing influence factors of technology transfer using fuzzy set theory. Int. J. Innovation Technol. Manage., 7: 71-87.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Lee, A.H.I., W.M. Wang and T.Y. Lin, 2010. An evaluation framework for technology transfer of new equipment in high technology industry. Technol. Forecasting Soc. Change, 77: 135-150.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Lee, S., W. Kim, Y.M. Kim and K.J. Oh, 2012. Using AHP to determine intangible priority factors for technology transfer adoption. Expert Syst. Appl., 39: 6388-6395.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Lipinski, J., M.C. Minutolo and L.M. Crothers, 2008. The complex relationship driving technology transfer: The potential opportunities missed by universities. J. Behav. Applied Manage., 9: 112-133.
Direct Link  |  

Ma, D., C.C. Chang and S.W. Hung, 2013. The Selection of Technology for Late-Starters: a Case Study of the Energy-Smart Photovoltaic Industry. Econ. Modell., 35: 10-20.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Manning, L., 2013. A Knowledge Exchange and Diffusion of Innovation (KEDI) model for primary production. Br. Food J., 115: 614-631.
Direct Link  |  

Moore, G.C. and I. Benbasat, 1996. Integrating Diffusion of Innovations and Theory of Reasoned Action Models to Predict Utilization of Information Technology by End-Users. In: Diffusion and Adoption of Information Technology, Kautz K. and J. Pries-Heje (Eds.). Springer, Boston, Massachusetts, USA., ISBN: 978-1-4757-4977-9, pp: 132-146.

Mysore, S., 2015. Technology commercialization through licensing: Experiences and lessons-a case study from Indian horticulture sector. J. Intellectual Property Rights, 20: 363-374.
Direct Link  |  

Naspetti, S., S. Mandolesi, J. Buysse, T. Latvala and P. Nicholas et al., 2017. Determinants of the acceptance of sustainable production strategies among dairy farmers: Development and testing of a modified technology acceptance model. Sustainability, Vol. 9, No. 10.

Nilashi, M., H. Ahmadi, A. Ahani, R. Ravangard and O. Bin-Ibrahim, 2016. Determining the importance of hospital information system adoption factors using fuzzy Analytic Network Process (ANP). Technol. Forecasting Social Change, 111: 244-264.
Direct Link  |  

Nouri, F.A., S.K. Esbouei and J. Antucheviciene, 2015. A hybrid MCDM approach based on fuzzy ANP and fuzzy TOPSIS for technology selection. Informatica, 26: 369-388.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Pedersen, S.M. and K.M. Lind, 2017. Precision Agriculture: Technology and Economic Perspectives. Springer, Cham, Switzerland, ISBN: 978-3-319-68713-1, Pages: 276.

Rehman, T., K. McKemey, C.M. Yates, R.J. Cooke, C.J. Garforth, R.B. Tranter, J.R. Park and P.T. Dorward, 2007. Identifying and understanding factors influencing the uptake of new technologies on dairy farms in SW England using the theory of reasoned action. Agric. Syst., 94: 281-293.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Rogers, E.M., 1983. Diffusion of Innovations. 3rd Edn., Free Press, New York, USA., ISBN:9780029266502, Pages: 453.

Sankat, C.K., K.F. Pun and C.B. Motilal, 2005. The technology transfer vehicle for agro-innovation development in the Caribbean: A model. Acta Hortic., 674: 343-350.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Swinnen, J. and R. Kuijpers, 2019. Value chain innovations for technology transfer in developing and emerging economies: Conceptual issues, typology and policy implications. Food Policy, 83: 298-309.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Tamayo, R.A.C., M.G.L. Ibarra and J.A.G. Macias, 2010. Better crop management with decision support systems based on wireless sensor networks. Proceedings of the 2010 7th International Conference on Electrical Engineering Computing Science and Automatic Control, September 8-10, 2010, IEEE, Tuxtla Gutierrez, Mexico, pp: 412-417.

Tektas, B. and S. Gozlu, 2008. General Packet Radio Service (GPRS) technology transfer: A case study to evaluate transferors. Proceedings of the 2008 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering & Technology (PICMET'08), July 27-31, 2008, IEEE, Cape Town, South Africa, pp: 2273-2280.

Tey, Y.S. and M. Brindal, 2012. Factors influencing the adoption of precision agricultural technologies: A review for policy implications. Precis. Agric., 13: 713-730.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Ullah, F., M.E.S. Sepasgozar and C. Wang, 2018. A Systematic review of smart real estate technology: drivers of, and barriers to, the use of digital disruptive technologies and online platforms. Sustainability, Vol. 10, No. 9. 10.3390/su10093142

Venkatesh, V. and F.D. Davis, 2000. A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Manage. Sci., 46: 186-204.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Venkatesh, V. and H. Bala, 2008. Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decis. Sci., 39: 273-315.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Venkatesh, V., J.Y. Thong and X. Xu, 2012. Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS. Q., 36: 157-178.
Direct Link  |  

Venkatesh, V., M.G. Morris, G.B. Davis and F.D. Davis, 2003. User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quart., 27: 425-478.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Verma, P. and N. Sinha, 2018. Integrating perceived economic wellbeing to technology acceptance model: The case of mobile based agricultural extension service. Technol. Forecasting and Social Change, 126: 207-216.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Wang, H.Z., G.W. Lin, J.Q. Wang, W.L. Gao and Y.F. Chen et al., 2014. Management of Big Data in the Internet of Things in Agriculture Based on Cloud Computing. In: Applied Mechanics and Materials, Kumar, V., Y.J. Park, B.V. Reddy and A.F. Wu (Eds.). Trans Tech Publications Inc., Zurich, Switzerland, pp: 1438-1444.

Winebrake, J.J., 1992. A study of technology-transfer mechanisms for federally funded R&D. J. Technol. Transfer, 17: 54-61.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Design and power by Medwell Web Development Team. © Medwell Publishing 2024 All Rights Reserved