Research Journal of Biological Sciences

Year: 2010
Volume: 5
Issue: 5
Page No. 400 - 403

Canal Length Measurement by Digital Radiography and Conventional Parallel Radiography

Authors : Mojdeh Mehdizadeh, Abbas Ali Khademi and Naser Nasr

References

Gundappa, M., S.Y. Ng and E.J. Whaites, 2006. Comparison of ultrasound digital and conventional radiography in differentiating periapical lesions. Dentomaxillofacial Radiol., 35: 326-333.
CrossRef  |  

Horner, K., A.C. Shearer, A. Walker and N.H. Wilson, 1990. Radiovisography: An initial evaluation. Br. Dent. J., 168: 244-248.
PubMed  |  Direct Link  |  

Lamus, F., J.O. Kat and A.G. Glaros, 2001. Evaluation of a digital measurement tool to estimate working length in endodntics. J. Contemp. Dent. Practice, 15: 24-30.
PubMed  |  Direct Link  |  

Lanzano, A., L. Forner and C. Llena, 2002. In vitro comparison of root canal measurements with conventional and digital radiography. Int. Endodntics J., 35: 542-550.
PubMed  |  Direct Link  |  

Ledy, B.J., D.A. Miles, C.W. Newton and C.E. Jr. Brown, 1994. Interpretation of endodontic file length using radiovisiography. J. Endodntics, 20: 542-545.
CrossRef  |  

Moyen, F., C. Benz, E. Snnabend and J.P. Lodter, 1969. Presentation and physical evaluation of radiovisiography. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol., 27: 106-110.

Pour, D.G., H. Razimi, S.J. Maralani and S. Zeighami, 2008. New software: Compartion between three software program for root canal length measurement. Dentomaxillofacial Radiol., 37: 228-231.
CrossRef  |  

Shearer, A.C., K. Horner and N.H. Wilson, 1991. Radiovisiography for length estimation in root canal treatment: An in vitro comparison with conventional radiography. Int. Endodntics J., 24: 233-239.
PubMed  |  Direct Link  |  

Stavropoulos, A. and A. Wenzel, 2006. Accuracy of cone beam dental CT, intraoral digital and conventional film radiography for defect of periapical lesions. Clinical Oral Investigations, 2006 Oct 18.

Subramanian, P., S. Konde and D.K. Mandanna, 2005. An in vitro comparsion of root canal measurement in primary teeth. J. Indian Soc. Pedod. Prev. Dent., 23: 124-125.
PubMed  |  Direct Link  |  

Swartz, D.B., A.E. Skidmore and J.A. Jr. Griffin, 1983. Twenty years of endodontic success and failure. J. Endodontics, 9: 198-202.
CrossRef  |  

Torabinejad, M., R. Danforth, K. Andren and C. Chan, 1989. Absorbed radiation by various tissues during simulated endodontic radiography. J. Endodontics, 15: 249-253.
CrossRef  |  

Val Cox, S., C.E. Jr Brown, S.L. Bricker and C.W. Newton, 1991. Radiographic interpretation of endodontic file length. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol., 72: 340-344.
CrossRef  |  

Voorde, H.E.V. and A.M. Bjorndahi, 1969. Estimating endodontic radiographs. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol., 27: 106-110.

Walton, R.E., 1973. Endodontic radiography techniques. Dent. Radio. Photoradio., 46: 51-59.

Wenzol, A., H. Hintze, L.M. Kold and S. Kold, 2002. Accuracy of computer-auto mated caries detection in digital radiographs compared with human observers. Eur. J. Oral Sci., 110: 199-203.
CrossRef  |  

White, S.C. and M.J. Pharaoh, 2004. Oral Radiology: Principle and Interpretation. 5th Edn., Mosby, St Louis, MO USA., pp: 560.

Design and power by Medwell Web Development Team. © Medwell Publishing 2024 All Rights Reserved