Research Journal of Biological Sciences

Year: 2010
Volume: 5
Issue: 8
Page No. 542 - 547

Effect of Planting Pattern and Plant Density on Physiological Characteristics and Yield of Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) in Iran

Authors : H. Rasekh, J. Asghari, M.N. Safarzadeh wishkai, S.L. Massoumi and R. Zakerinejad

References

Azam-Ali, S.N., R.C.N. Rao, J. Craigon, K.D.R. Wadia and J.H. Williams, 1993. A method for calculating the population/yield relation of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) in semi-arid climates. J. Agric. Sci., 121: 213-222.
CrossRef  |  

Bell, M.J., B. Harch and G.C. Wright, 1991. Plant population studies on peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) in subtropical Australia. I. Growth under fully irrigated conditions. Aust. J. Exp. Agric., 31: 535-543.

Bell, M.J., R.C. Muchow and G.L. Wilson, 1987. The effect of plant population on peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) in a monsoonal tropical environment. Field Crop Res., 17: 91-107.
CrossRef  |  

Egli, B., 1988. Plant density and soybean yield. Crop Sci., 28: 977-981.
Direct Link  |  

Gardner, F.P. and E.Q. Auma, 1989. Canopy structure, light interception and yield and market quality of peanut genotypes as influenced by planting pattern and planting date. Field Crop Res., 20: 13-29.
CrossRef  |  

Hammer G.L., T.R. Sinclair, K.J. Boote, G.C. Wright, H. Meinke and M.J. Bell, 1995. A peanut simulation model. I: Model development and testing. Agron. J., 87: 1085-1093.
Direct Link  |  

Harris, D. and M. Natarajan, 1987. Physiological basis for yield advantage in a sorghum/groundnut intercrop exposed to drought. 2. Plant temperature, water status and components of yield. Field Crops Res., 17: 273-288.
CrossRef  |  

Hauser, E.W. and G.A. Buchanan, 1981. Influence of row spacing, seeding rates and herbicide systems on the competitiveness and yield of peanuts. Peanut Sci., 8: 74-81.
CrossRef  |  

Hosseini, N.M., R.H. Ellis and B. Yazdi-Samadi, 2001. Effects of plant population density on yield and yield components of eight isolines of cv. Clark (Glicine max L.). J. Agric. Sci. Technol., 3: 131-139.
Direct Link  |  

Jaffar, Z. and F.D. Gardner, 1988. Canopy development, yield and market quality in peanut as affected by genotype and planting pattern. Crop Sci., 28: 299-305.

Kirby, J.S. and C. Kitbamrooning, 1986. Growth and development of the runner virginia market type peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Proc. Am. Peanut Res. Educ. Soc., 18: 48-48.

Kvien, C.S. and C.L. Bergmark, 1987. Growth and development of the florunner peanut cultivar as influenced by population, planting data and water avalibility. Peanut Sci., 14: 11-16.

Kvien, C.S., W.D. Branch, R.J. Henning and J.E. Pallas, 1988. Growth and development of the runner and Virginia market type peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) as influenced by planting density. Oleagindeux, 43: 67-73.

Madkour, M.A., S.I. El-Mohandes and A.M. El-Wakil, 1992. Effect of row-spacing, phosphorus, potassium and born application on some peanut cultivars. Egypt. J. Agron., 17: 127-140.
Direct Link  |  

Mixon, A.S., 1989. Influence of irrigation, row spacing and seeding on yield and market quality of peanut. Applied Agric. Res., 1: 289-293.

Papastylianou, I., 1995. Spacing of peanut plants (Arachis hypogaea L.) under irrigation. Eur. J. Agron., 4: 101-107.
Direct Link  |  

Samarasinghe, P.W.S.M and J.W. Tannar, 1989. Dry matter partitioning and growth analysis of peanut. Troplcal Agriculturist, 145: 103-111.

Williams, J.H., 1992. Concepts for the application of crop physiological models for crop breeding in groundnut. Proceeding of the International Workshop on a Global Prespective, Nov. 25-29, International Crops Research Institute for the Semi Arid Tropics, Patanceru, pp: 345-351.

Wright, G.C. and M.J. Bell, 1992. Plant population studies on peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) in subtropical Australia. 3. Growth and water use during a terminal drought stress. Aust. J. Exp. Agric., 32: 197-203.
CrossRef  |  

Yilmas, H.A., 1999. Effect of different plant densities of two groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) genotypes on yield, yield components and oil and protein contents. Turk. J. Agric. Forestry, 23: 299-308.

Design and power by Medwell Web Development Team. © Medwell Publishing 2024 All Rights Reserved