The Social Sciences

Year: 2010
Volume: 5
Issue: 6
Page No. 481 - 485

The Effects of Focused and Unfocused Indirect Feedback on Accuracy in EFL Writing

Authors : Afsar Rouhi and Mitra Samiei

References

Bitchener, J. and U. Knoch, 2008. The value of written corrective feedback for migrant and international students. Language Teach. Res., 12: 409-431.
CrossRef  |  

Bitchener, J. and U. Knoch, 2009. The relative effectiveness of different types of direct written corrective feedback. System, 37: 322-329.
CrossRef  |  

Chandler, J., 2003. The efficacy of various kinds of error feedback for improvement in the accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing. J. Second Language Writing, 12: 267-296.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Ellis, N., 2005. At the interface: Dynamic interactions of explicit and implicit knowledge. Studies Second Language Acquisition, 27: 305-352.
CrossRef  |  

Ellis, R., Y. Sheen, M. Murakami and H. Takashima, 2008. The effects of focused and unfocused written corrective feedback in an English as a foreign language context. System, 36: 353-371.
CrossRef  |  

Fazio, L.L., 2001. The effect of corrections and commentaries on the journal writing accuracy of minority-and majority language students. J. Second Language Writing, 10: 235-249.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Ferris, D.R. and B. Roberts, 2001. Error feedback in L2 writing classes: How explicit does it need to be?. J. Second Language Writing, 10: 161-184.
CrossRef  |  

Ferris, D.R. and J.S. Hedgocok, 2005. Teaching ESL Composition: Purpose, Process and Practice. 2nd Edn., Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, ISBN: 10:0805844678.

Ferris, D.R., 2003. Response to Student Writing: Implications for Second Language Students. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah NJ. ISBN: 10-8058-3657-8.

Hyland, K., 1990. Providing productive feedback. ELT. J., 44: 279-285.
CrossRef  |  

Keh, C.L., 1990. Feedback in the writing process: A model and method for implementation. English Language Teach. J., 44: 294-304.
CrossRef  |  

Lalande, J., 1982. Reducing composition errors: An experiment. Modern Language J., 66: 140-149.
Direct Link  |  

Richards, J.C. and C. Lockhart, 1994. Reflective Teaching in Second Language Classrooms. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, ISBN: 13: 9780521458030.

Robb, T., S. Ross and I. Shortreed, 1986. Salience of feedback on error and its effect on EFL writing quality. TESOL Q., 20: 83-96.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Schmidt, R., 1994. Deconstructing consciousness in search of useful definitions for applied linguistics. AILA Rev., 11: 11-26.

Sheen, Y., 2007. The effect of focused written corrective feedback and language aptitude on ESL learners acquisition of articles. TESOL Quarterly, 41: 255-283.
Direct Link  |  

Terry, R., 1989. Teaching and evaluating writing as a communicative skill. Foreign Language Annals, 22: 43-54.
Direct Link  |  

Truscott, J. and Y.A. Hsu, 2008. Error correction, revision and learning. J. Second Lang. Writing, 17: 292-305.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Truscott, J., 1996. The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes. Language Learning, 46: 327-369.
CrossRef  |  

Truscott, J., 1999. The case for the case for grammar correction in L2 writing classes: A response to Ferris. J. Second Language Writing, 8: 111-122.
CrossRef  |  

Truscott, J., 2004. Evidence and conjecture on the effects of correction: A response to Chandler. J. Second Lang. Writing, 13: 337-343.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Truscott, J., 2007. The effect of error correction on learners' ability to write accurately. J. Second Lang. Writing, 16: 255-272.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Zacharias, N.T., 2007. Teacher and student attitudes toward teacher feedback. RELC J., 38: 38-52.
CrossRef  |  

Zamel, V., 1985. Responding to student writing. TESOL Q., 19: 79-101.
CrossRef  |  

Design and power by Medwell Web Development Team. © Medwell Publishing 2022 All Rights Reserved