The Social Sciences
481 - 485
The Effects of Focused and Unfocused Indirect Feedback on Accuracy in EFL Writing
Bitchener, J. and U. Knoch, 2008. The value of written corrective feedback for migrant and international students. Language Teach. Res., 12: 409-431.CrossRef |
Bitchener, J. and U. Knoch, 2009. The relative effectiveness of different types of direct written corrective feedback. System, 37: 322-329.CrossRef |
Chandler, J., 2003. The efficacy of various kinds of error feedback for improvement in the accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing. J. Second Language Writing, 12: 267-296.CrossRef | Direct Link |
Ellis, N., 2005. At the interface: Dynamic interactions of explicit and implicit knowledge. Studies Second Language Acquisition, 27: 305-352.CrossRef |
Ellis, R., Y. Sheen, M. Murakami and H. Takashima, 2008. The effects of focused and unfocused written corrective feedback in an English as a foreign language context. System, 36: 353-371.CrossRef |
Fazio, L.L., 2001. The effect of corrections and commentaries on the journal writing accuracy of minority-and majority language students. J. Second Language Writing, 10: 235-249.CrossRef | Direct Link |
Ferris, D.R. and B. Roberts, 2001. Error feedback in L2 writing classes: How explicit does it need to be?. J. Second Language Writing, 10: 161-184.CrossRef |
Ferris, D.R. and J.S. Hedgocok, 2005. Teaching ESL Composition: Purpose, Process and Practice. 2nd Edn., Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, ISBN: 10:0805844678.
Ferris, D.R., 2003. Response to Student Writing: Implications for Second Language Students. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah NJ. ISBN: 10-8058-3657-8.
Hyland, K., 1990. Providing productive feedback. ELT. J., 44: 279-285.CrossRef |
Keh, C.L., 1990. Feedback in the writing process: A model and method for implementation. English Language Teach. J., 44: 294-304.CrossRef |
Lalande, J., 1982. Reducing composition errors: An experiment. Modern Language J., 66: 140-149.Direct Link |
Richards, J.C. and C. Lockhart, 1994. Reflective Teaching in Second Language Classrooms. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, ISBN: 13: 9780521458030.
Robb, T., S. Ross and I. Shortreed, 1986. Salience of feedback on error and its effect on EFL writing quality. TESOL Q., 20: 83-96.CrossRef | Direct Link |
Schmidt, R., 1994. Deconstructing consciousness in search of useful definitions for applied linguistics. AILA Rev., 11: 11-26.
Sheen, Y., 2007. The effect of focused written corrective feedback and language aptitude on ESL learners acquisition of articles. TESOL Quarterly, 41: 255-283.Direct Link |
Terry, R., 1989. Teaching and evaluating writing as a communicative skill. Foreign Language Annals, 22: 43-54.Direct Link |
Truscott, J. and Y.A. Hsu, 2008. Error correction, revision and learning. J. Second Lang. Writing, 17: 292-305.CrossRef | Direct Link |
Truscott, J., 1996. The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes. Language Learning, 46: 327-369.CrossRef |
Truscott, J., 1999. The case for the case for grammar correction in L2 writing classes: A response to Ferris. J. Second Language Writing, 8: 111-122.CrossRef |
Truscott, J., 2004. Evidence and conjecture on the effects of correction: A response to Chandler. J. Second Lang. Writing, 13: 337-343.CrossRef | Direct Link |
Truscott, J., 2007. The effect of error correction on learners' ability to write accurately. J. Second Lang. Writing, 16: 255-272.CrossRef | Direct Link |
Zacharias, N.T., 2007. Teacher and student attitudes toward teacher feedback. RELC J., 38: 38-52.CrossRef |
Zamel, V., 1985. Responding to student writing. TESOL Q., 19: 79-101.CrossRef |