The Social Sciences

Year: 2016
Volume: 11
Issue: 10
Page No. 2606 - 2616

Learners’ Interpretation of Geometric Concepts in the Intermediate Phase: The Case of Limpopo Province

Authors : ZingiswaJojo

References

Abdullah, A.H. and E. Zakaria, 2012. The activities based on Van Hiele's phase-based learning: Experts and pre-service teachers views. J. Math. Statist., 8: 385-395.

Adolphus, T., 2011. Problems of teaching and learning of geometry in secondary schools in Rivers State, Nigeria. Int. J. Emerging Sci., 1: 143-152.
Direct Link  |  

Beskin, N.M., 1947. Didactics of Geometry. Uchpedgiz, Moscow, Russia.

Boling, A.N., 1991. They don't like math? Well, let's do something. Arithmetic Teacher, 38: 17-19.
Direct Link  |  

Bruce, C., J. Moss and J. Ross, 2012. Survey of JK to grade 2 teachers in Ontario, Canada: Report to the literacy and numeracy secretariat of the ministry of education. Ontario Ministry of Education, Toronto, ON.

Burger, W.F. and J.M. Shaughnessy, 1986. Characterizing the van Hiele levels of development in geometry. J. Res. Math. Educ., 17: 31-48.
Direct Link  |  

Clements, D.H. and J. Sarama, 2011. Early childhood teacher education: The case of geometry. J. Math. Teacher Educ., 14: 133-148.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Clements, D.H., 2003. Perspective on The Child's thought and Geometry. In: Classics in Mathematics Education Research, Carpenter, T.P., J.A. Dossey and J.L. Koehler (Eds.). National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Reston, VA., pp: 60-66.

De Villiers, M.D. and R.M. Njisane, 1987. The development of geometric thinking among black high school pupils in Kwazulu (republic of South Africa). Proceedings of the 11th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Volume 3, July 19-25, 1987, Montreal, Canada, pp: 117-123-.

De Villiers, M.D., 1998. Research evidence on hierarchical thinking, teaching strategies and the Van Hiele theory: Some critical comments. Internal Rumeus Report, No. 10, University of Stellenbosch, Stellenbosch, South Africa.

Devetak, I., S.A. Glazar and J. Vogrinc, 2010. The role of qualitative research in science education. Eur. J. Math. Sci. Technol. Educ., 6: 77-84.
Direct Link  |  

DoBE., 2011. Integrated strategic planning framework for teacher education and development in South Africa. Technical Report, Department of Basic Education, Pretoria, April 2011, pp: 202.

Drefs, M. and L. D'Amour, 2014. The application of ambiguous figures to mathematics: In search of the spatial components of number. Proceedings of the 38th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, July 15-20, 2014, Vancouver, Canada -.

Dubinsky, E. and M.A. McDonald, 2001. APOS: A constructivist theory of learning in undergraduate mathematics education research. New ICMI Study, 7: 275-282.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Dubinsky, E., 1991. Constructive Aspects of Reflective Abstraction in Advanced Mathematics. In: Epistemological Foundations of Mathematical Experience, Steffe, L.P. (Ed.). Springer, New York, USA.

EQAO., 2014. Summary of results and strategies for teachers, 2013-2014. Assessments of Reading, Writing and Mathematics, Primary and Junior Divisions, Education Quality and Accountability Office, pp: 38.

Farmer, G., B.N. Verdine, K. Lucca, T. Davies, R. Dempsey, K. Hirsh-Pasek and R.M. Golinkoff, 2013. Putting the pieces together: Spatial skills at age 3 predict to spatial and math performance at age 5. The Society for Research in Child Development, Seattle, WA., April 2013.

Freudenthal, H., 1971. Geometry between the devil and the deep sea. Educ. Stud. Math., 3: 413-435.

Fuys, D., D. Geddes and R. Tischler, 1988. The van Hiele model of thinking in geometry among adolescents. J. Res. Math. Educ. Monograph, 3: 1-196.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Gavin, M.K., L.P. Belkin, A.M. Spinelli and J.S. Marie, 2001. Navigating through geometry in grades 3-5. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Reston, VA.

Giamati, C. and M. Weiland, 1997. An exploration of American Indian students' perceptions of patterning, symmetry and geometry. J. Am. Indian Educ., 36: 27-48.
Direct Link  |  

Hoffer, A., 1981. Geometry is more than proof. Math. Teacher, 74: 11-18.
Direct Link  |  

Jamison, R.E., 2000. Learning the language of mathematics. Lang. Learn. Across Disciplines, 4: 45-54.
Direct Link  |  

Johnson, C.Y., 2014. A not-close-enough view of Hawking. The Boston Globe, Boston, MA., January 29, 2014. https://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P2-35632716.html.

Jojo, Z.M.M. and A. Maharaj, 2013. From human activity to conceptual understanding of the Chain Rule. Redimat, 2: 77-99.

Jones, K., 2002. Issues in the Teaching and Learning of Geometry. In: Aspects of Teaching Secondary Mathematics: Perspectives on Practice, Haggerty, L. (Ed.). Routledge, London, UK., pp: 121-139.

Jones, K., T. Fujita and S. Kunimune, 2012. Promoting productive reasoning in the teaching of geometry in lower secondary school: Towards a future research agenda. Proceedings of the 12th International Congress on Mathematical Education, July 8-15, 2012, Seoul, Korea -.

Lappan, G., 1999. Geometry: The forgotten strand. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics News Bulletin No. 36, December 1999, pp: 3.

Lohman, D.F., 1996. Spatial Ability and G. In: Human Abilities: Their Nature and Assessment, Dennis, I. and P. Tapsfield (Eds.). Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ., pp: 97-116.

Matang, R., 1998. The role of ethnomathematics and reflective learning in mathematics education in Papua New Guinea. J. Educ. Stud., 20: 22-29.
Direct Link  |  

Mix, K.S. and Y.L. Cheng, 2012. The Relation Between Space and Math: Developmental and Educational Implications. In: Advances in Child Development and Behavior, Benson, J.B. (Ed.). Vol. 42, Academic Press, San Diego, CA., ISBN: 9780123982858, pp: 197-243.

NCTM., 1989. Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Reston, VA.

NCTM., 2006. Standards of Teaching Mathematics. National Council for Teachers of Mathematics, Reston, VA.

NCTM., 2010. Teaching Children Mathematics. National Council for Teachers of Mathematics, Reston, VA.

Oyoo, S.O., 2009. Beyond general proficiency in language of instruction: Towards the appropriate perspective on language for effective learning in African science classrooms. Proceedings of the 17th Annual Conference of the Southern African Association for Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, January 19-22, 2009, South Africa, pp: 197-212.

Ozerem, A., 2012. Misconceptions in geometry and suggested solutions for seventh grade students. Procedia-Social Behav. Sci., 55: 720-729.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Piaget, J. and B. Inhelder, 1967. A Child's Conception of Space. WW. Norton, New York, USA.

Piaget, J., 1966. Psychology of Intelligence. Littlefield, Adams and Co., Totowa, New Jersey, pp: 119-155.

Piaget, J., 1972. The Principles of Genetic Epistemology. Routledge, London, UK.

Presmeg, N., 1991. Applying van Hiele's theory in senior primary geometry: Use of phases between the levels. Pythagoras, 26: 9-11.

Rahim, M.H., 2014. Research implications for teaching and learning strategies in undergraduate mathematics. Proceedings of the Frontiers in Mathematics and Science Education Research Conference, May 1-3, 2014, Famagusta, North Cyprus -.

Safuanov, I.S., 2007. Genetic approach to teaching geometry. Proceedings of the 31st Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Volume 4, July 8-13, 2007, PME., Seoul, pp: 145-152.

Senk, S.L., 1989. Van Hiele levels and achievement in writing geometry proofs. J. Res. Math. Educ., 20: 309-321.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Tall, D., 2004. Thinking through three worlds of mathematics. Proceedings of the 28th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, July 14-18, 2004, Bergen, Norway, pp: 281-288.

Usiskin, Z., 1982. Van Hieles' levels of achievement in secondary school geometry. CDASSG Project, The University of Chicago, pp: 219.

Usiskin, Z., 1996. Mathematics as a Language. In: Communication in Mathematics, K-12 and Beyond 1996 Yearbook, Elliott, P.C. and M.J. Kenney (Eds.). National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Reston VA., pp: 231-243.

Van Hiele, P.M., 1986. Structure and Insight: A Theory of Mathematics Education. Academic Press, Orlando, FL.

Van Hiele, P.M., 1999. Developing geometric thinking through activities that begin with play. Teaching Children Math., 5: 310-316.
Direct Link  |  

Wang, Q. and H.L. Woo, 2007. Systematic planning for ICT integration in topic learning. Educ. Technol. Society, 10: 148-156.
Direct Link  |  

Design and power by Medwell Web Development Team. © Medwell Publishing 2024 All Rights Reserved