Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances

Year: 2010
Volume: 9
Issue: 9
Page No. 1370 - 1374

Effects of Live Yeast Culture (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) on Milk Production and Blood Lipid Levels of Jersey Cows in Early Lactation

Authors : D. Cakiroglu, Y. Meral, D. Pekmezci and F. Akdag

Abstract: Effects of live yeast culture (Saccharomyces cerevisiae 1026) as a feed additive, on milk production and blood lipids contents of 10 Jersey cows in early lactation were determined in 21 days. Twenty Jersey cows, which have had their second delivery were allocated equally to one or the other treatments: control vs experimental. From 45-66th days in milk, 10 g day-1 of Saccharomyces cerevisiae (1x108 cfu g-1) dissolved in 200 mL of water were administrated to cows. Daily milk yields were recorded individually and blood samples were obtained weekly for each experimental cow. The diet supplemented with Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Yea-Sacc 1026/Alltech) implied an extension at the peak lactation period and a statistically significant increase of serum cholesterol and LDL (p<0.05) contents of early lactation Jersey cows.

How to cite this article:

D. Cakiroglu, Y. Meral, D. Pekmezci and F. Akdag, 2010. Effects of Live Yeast Culture (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) on Milk Production and Blood Lipid Levels of Jersey Cows in Early Lactation. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances, 9: 1370-1374.

INTRODUCTION

Yeast is already in widespread use as a feed additive. Fermentated yeast and yeast cultures have been fed to dairy cattle for >60 years with varied responses (Schingoethe et al., 2004). In some studies, yeast cultures improved Dry Matter Intake (DMI) (Williams et al., 1991; Wohlt et al., 1991; Dann et al., 2000) and milk production (Arambel and Kent, 1990; Piva et al., 1993; Wang et al., 2001), whereas other studies (Erdman and Sharma, 1989; Arambel and Kent, 1990; Soder and Holden, 1999) found no response to yeast cultures.

Saccharomyces cerevisiae feed additives have been used as an alternative to antimicrobial feed additives for over 10 years (Lynch and Martin, 2002) but reported effects are controversial. Some researchers indicated the benefits associated with S. cerevisiae as increased DMI (Carro et al., 1992), increased fiber digestion (Williams et al., 1991) and increased milk production in dairy cattle (Harris and Webb, 1990; Wang et al., 2001). In vitro experiments have also reported that in some cases, S. cerevisiae culture favorably altered the total ruminal microorganism fermentation and stimulated lactate uptake and cellulose digestion by pure cultures of predominant ruminal bacteria (Nisbet and Martin, 1991; Martin and Nisbet, 1992; Callaway and Martin, 1997). In this scheme, removal of oxygen from the rumen environment by S. cerevisiae may play a prominent role in increasing bacterial viability (Wallace, 1994). Even though the effects of S. cerevisiae are not always consistent (Wohlt et al., 1991), few models have been proposed regarding the stimulatory effects of yeast culture on ruminal fermentation (Dawson, 1990; Lyons et al., 1993; Wang et al., 2001).

Several studies have suggested that S. cerevisiae cultures moderate the ruminal pH by increasing lactate utilization in ruminal lactate-utilizing bacteria (Nisbet and Martin, 1991; Martin and Nisbet, 1992; Koul et al., 1998) and also the yeast culture provides soluble growth factors (i.e., organic acids, B vitamins and amino acids) that stimulate growth of ruminal bacteria which utilize lactate and digest cellulose (Wiedmeier et al., 1987; Newbold et al., 1995; Callaway and Martin, 1997).

Supplementing diets with S. cerevisiae was shown to increase total VKungolatile Fatty Acids (VFA) and propionic acid production, besides higher propionate concentration and decreased acetate to propionate ratio were determined in some experiments (Dawson et al., 1990; Nisbet and Martin, 1991; Wohlt et al., 1991; Sullivan and Martin, 1999). Higher VFA, especially propionic acid are important in terms of enhanced lactose production, milk volume and overall energy balance (Miller-Webster et al., 2002).

On the other hand, many researchers stated that S. cerevisiae supplementation had no direct effects on prepartum or postpartum dry matter intake or milk yield and composition (Erdman and Sharma, 1989; Swartz et al., 1994; Kung et al., 1997; Soder and Holden, 1999). Furthermore, yeast additive did have no or very little effect on ruminal pH according to some researchers (Erasmus et al., 1992; Lynch and Martin, 2002). Erasmus et al. (1992) suggested that supplementation of S. cerevisiae tended to increase microbial protein synthesis in dairy cows and significantly altered the amino acid profile of the duodenal digesta.

The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the effects of S. cerevisiae (Yea-Sacc 1026/Alltech) on milk production, serum total cholesterol, triglycerides, High Density Lipoprotein (HDL) and Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL) in Jersey cows in early lactation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study was carried out in the Karaköy Farm of General Directorate of Agricultural Enterprises (TIGEM), Samsun, Turkey.

Twenty Jersey cows which have had their second delivery were used in this study. Ages, lactation number, lactation period of all the cows used in this study were similar and same housing and feeding conditions were valid for all of them. The cows were fed with a ration consisting of 10 kg of concentrate mixture (commercial feed for dairy cattle), 2 kg of triticale hay and 15 kg of maize silage totally per day, per cow. They were divided randomly to 2 groups, forming a study group and a control group. Starting from the 45th day of the lactation period, 10 g day-1 of S. cerevisiae (Yea-Sacc/Alltech Co.) were administrated to cows for 21 days in 200 mL of water. Water with yeast was fed by opening the mouth of each cow and pouring the water to the oesophagus, hence securing an intake of 10 g day-1 of yeast for each cow. S. cerevisiae was a live culture consisting 1x108 cfu g-1 (EU Ref. No. CBS493.94). Milks were collected twice a day by automatic milking machine (WESTFALIA) and total milk yields for each animal were recorded daily through days 38-79 postpartum, thus having the milk yields also before and after the yeast ingestion.

Blood were collected via vena jugularis on the 45, 52, 59, 66 and 73th days postpartum. Obtained bloods were centrifuged and sera were seperated into sterilised tubes. Total cholesterol, triglycerides, HDL and LDL were measured using an autoanalyser (Tokyo Boeki) with Spinreakt commercial kits. Results were confirmed by spectrophotometry (Humalyzer) using Humman commercial kits, with results expressed in mg dL-1.

The serum biochemical values and milk yield values analysed in the study did not show a normal distribution, therefore Friedman test was used to evaluate the weekly changes of serum biochemical values and milk yields of both experimental and control groups (John, 1971).

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Weekly changes at serum cholesterol, triglyceride, HDL and LDL values of the experimental and control groups are shown in Table 1. Changes for the biochemical values of the control group for the entire 5 weeks period was determined insignificant (p>0.05). Yet, weekly changes in the cholesterol and LDL values of the experimental group was determined significant (p<0.05), where no statistically important variances was calculated at HDL and triglyceride values (p>0.05).

Standart errors and average values of milk yield changes according to weeks are shown in Table 2. Milk yield changes according to weeks of the control group was determined statistically insignificant, where it was statistically significant for the experimental group (p<0.05). Average daily milk yield at the 37th day of lactation (before treatment) for the experimental group, was 16.05 kg but it was 15.63 kg at the week after the experiment was ended (after treatment). The effects of

Saccharomyces cerevisia on milk yield are shown in Fig. 1. Since the experiment started at the peak period of lactation, it was observed that this peak period extended with the effect of Saccharomyces cerevisia. Weekly changes of the milk yield at both study and control groups indicates that the insignificant variation at the control group was at a statistically significant level at the studygroup.

This study was designed to investigate the effects of yeast cultures on the milk yields, serum cholesterol and triglyceride values of lactating Jersey cows. There are controversial reports on the effect of S. cerevisiae on milk yield of dairy cows. On one hand, Swartz et al. (1994), performed a 14 weeks study with 366 lactating Holstein cows in the first 120 days of lactation from seven farms to evaluate supplementation of two S. cerevisiae yeast cultures containing about 108 cfu g-1 viable yeast cells on milk production and composition and reported that milk production, milk fat and protein percentage, milk fat and protein production were not affected by either yeast treatment.

There were no significant interactions of farm by treatment, stage of lactation by treatment, lactation number by treatment or week by treatment. No differences in performance were significant for early lactation cows that calved during the trial and daily DMI measured on 39 cows at one location did not differ among treatments. Yeast supplementation was not beneficial for any production parameters under the nutritional management programs of these seven dairy farms.
Similarly, Erdman and Sharma (1989), Arambel and Kent (1990), Soder and Holden (1999) and Kung et al. (1997), found no response in milk yield to yeast cultures.

Table 1: Average value and standart errors of serum cholesterol, triglyceride, LDL and HDL levels of the experiment and control groups
*p<0.05

Table 2: Milk yield averages and standart errors for the control and experiment groups
*p<0.05

Seasonal and climate factors nearby feed ration, concentrate level in ration may play a role at these results. On the other hand, many studies suggest that yeast cultures improved DMI (Williams et al., 1991; Wohlt et al., 1991) and milk production (Williams et al., 1991; Wohlt et al., 1991; Erasmus et al., 1992; Huber, 1998). Lynch and Martin (2002), observed that S. cerevisiae culture and S. cerevisiae live cell feed supplements had little effect on milk production, ruminal fluid pH and total VFA concentrations in early lactation cows.

Wohlt et al. (1991), found that S. cerevisiae supplementation stimulated DMI and milk production in Holstein cows fed a combination of corn silage, grain and hay. These results tend to support the findings which revealed an extension of the peak period of lactation at the experiment group, where no variation was determined at the control group and this observation indicates the effect of S. cerevisiae supplementation on milk yield and the extension of the plateau period.

Several studies demonstrated that S. cerevisiae feed additives increased the production of acetate, propionate and total VFA in dairy cows (Nisbet and Martin, 1991; Piva et al., 1993; Miller-Webster et al., 2002) and a decrease in the acetate:propionate ratio was observed due to the greater increase in the propionate production relative to acetate (Nisbet and Martin, 1991). The higher propionic acid production that resulted from feeding S. cerevisiae would be expected to have a positive effect on milk volume.

Fig. 1: Effect of Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Yea-Sacc 1026/Alltech) on milk yields of the groups

Propionate is used by the cow to produce glucose and can be in short supply during prenatal period and lactation
Since glucose is needed to produce energy, less fat might be mobilized and this condition might be advantageous in preventing postpartum metabolic diseases, especially ketosis.

Iwanska et al. (1999) evaluated the effects of yeast culture (S. cerevisiae 1026) in 30 early-lactation Black and White Lowland cows and reported that there were no significant differences in the glucose level, mineral contents and enzyme activities of the blood serum. Similarly Banadaky et al. (2003), investigated the effects of S. cerevisiae in early lactation Holstein dairy cows and no differences were demonstrated in the concentration of glucose, calcium, phosphorus, sodium, cholesterol, triglycerids, urea nitrogen and total protein in plasma of all cows receiving different diets.

The results regarding HDL and triglyceride levels are in accordance with these two studies, as no differences in serum HDL and triglyceride levels were recorded with feeding S. cerevisiae. But different from the studies performed before, in the study, cholesterol and LDL levels for the 5 weeks after the 45th day of lactation presented a statistically significant difference.

CONCLUSION

S. cerevisiae (Yea-Sacc 1026/Alltech) used as a feed additive implied an extension of the peak lactation period during the experiment. Weekly changes of the milk yield of both control and study groups indicates a statistically significant variation at the experimental group, where no
significant difference was determined at the control group. This situation may suggest that S. cerevisiae prolongs the peak period of lactation at Jersey cows. S. cerevisiae (Yea-Sacc 1026/Alltech) also increased serum cholesterol and LDL contents of early lactation Jersey cows but did not modify serum HDL or triglyceride levels. During early lactation, cows often are in negative energy and nitrogen balance and this study demonstrates the S. cerevisiae supplementations are to be the right attempts in improving the milk yield.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The researchers are particularly grateful to Vet. Med. Uzeyir Akyel and principle Vet. Med. Dr. Ahmet Cira from the Karaköy Farm of General Directorate of Agricultural Enterprises (TIGEM), Samsun, Turkey, to All-Tech Biotechnology Izmir-Turkey and to Dr. Zehra Selçuk of Ondokuz Mayis University, Samsun, Turkey.

Design and power by Medwell Web Development Team. © Medwell Publishing 2024 All Rights Reserved