Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences

Year: 2017
Volume: 12
Issue: 8 SI
Page No. 8355 - 8359

Assessing the Efficiency of Scoring Rubrics Assisted Reading Approach in the Review of Software Requirements Work Products

Authors : Emmanuel O.C. Mkpojiogu and Nor Laily Hashim

References

Abrahamsson, J.M.P., 2007. Product-focused software process improvement. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Product-Focused Software Process Improvement (PROFES 2007), July 2-4, 2007, Springer, Riga, Latvia, pp: 175-187.

Basili, V.R. and R.W. Selby, 1987. Comparing the effectiveness of software testing strategies. IEEE. Trans. Software Eng., 13: 1278-1296.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Basili, V.R., S. Green, O. Laitenberger, F. Lanubile and F. Shull et al., 1996. The empirical investigation of perspective-based reading. Empirical Software Eng., 1: 133-164.
Direct Link  |  

Berling, T. and P. Runeson, 2003. Evaluation of a perspective based review method applied in an industrial setting. IEEE. Proc. Software, 150: 177-184.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Boehm, B.W., 1981. Software Engineering Economics. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, ISBN: 9780138221225, Pages: 767.

Carver, J., 2003. Replicated Studies: Building a Body of Knowledge about Software Reading Techniques. In: Lecture Notes on Empirical Software Engineering, Juristo, N. and A.M. Moreno (Eds.). World Scientific, Singapore, ISBN:981-02-4914-4, pp: 39-84.

Cheng, B. and R. Jeffery, 1996. Comparing inspection strategies for software requirement specifications. Proceedings of the Conference on Australian Software Engineering, July 14-18, 1996, IEEE, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, ISBN:0-8186-7635-3, pp: 203-211.

Ciolkowski, M., C. Differding, O. Laitenberger and J. Munch, 1997. Empirical Investigation of Perspective-based Reading: A Replicated Experiment. Fraunhofer Institute for Experimental Software Engineering, Germany,.

Hussain, A. and E.O.C. Mkpojiogu, 2016. An application of Kano method in the elicitation of stakeholder satisfying requirements for an E-ebola awareness system. Intl. J. Syst. Appl. Eng. Dev., 10: 169-178.

Hussain, A., E.O.C. Mkpojiogu and F.M. Kamal, 2015. Eliciting user satisfying requirements for an e-health awareness system using kano model. Proceedings of the 14th WSEAS International Conference on Computer and Conputational Science (ACACOS’15), April 23-26, 2015, WSEAS Press, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, ISBN:978-1-61804-297-2, pp: 156-165.

Hussain, A., E.O.C. Mkpojiogu and M.N.M. Nawi, 2016. Requirements model for an E-health awareness portal. Proceedings of the International Conference on Applied Science and Technology (ICAST’16) Vol. 1761, April 11-13, 2016, AIP, Kedah, Malaysia, pp: 020048-020048.

IEEE Std 830, 1998. IEEE recommended practice for software requirements specifications. Software Engineering Standards Committee of the IEEE Computer Society, pp: 11

ISO., 2011. IEC25010: 2011 Systems and software engineering-systems and software quality requirements and evaluation (SQuaRE)-system and software quality models. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.

Laitenberger, O., 2000. Cost-effective detection of software defects through perspective-based inspections. Ph.D Thesis, University of Kaiserslautern, Kaiserslautern, Germany.

Laitenberger, O., E.K. Emam and T.G. Harbich, 2001. An internally replicated quasi-experimental comparison of checklist and perspective based reading of code documents. IEEE. Trans. Software Eng., 27: 387-421.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Lee, K., 2006. Development and evaluation of Value-Based Review (VBR) Methods. Master Thesis, Fculty of the Graduate School, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.

Mkpojiogu, E.O.C. and N.L. Hashim, 2017. Improving the quality of software requirements work products using scoring rubrics assisted reading. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Computing and Informatics (ICOCI’17), April 25-27, 2017, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, pp: 656-662.

Porter, A.A. and L.G. Votta, 1994. An experiment to assess different defect detection methods for software requirements inspections. Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Software Engineering, May 16-21, 1994, IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, California, USA., ISBN:0-8186-5855-X, pp: 103-112.

Porter, A.A., L.G. Votta and V.R. Basili, 1995. Comparing detection methods for software requirements inspections: A replicated experiment. IEEE. Trans. Software Eng., 21: 563-575.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Saito, S., M. Takeuchi, S. Yamada and M. Aoyama, 2014. RISDM: A requirements inspection systems design methodology: Perspective-based design of the pragmatic quality model and question set to SRS. Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE 22nd International Conference on Requirements Engineering (RE), August 25-29, 2014, IEEE, Karlskrona, Sweden, ISBN:978-1-4799-3033-3, pp: 223-232.

Shull, F., I. Rus and V. Basili, 2000. How perspective-based reading can improve requirements inspections. Comput., 33: 73-79.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Sommerville, I., 2007. Software Engineering. 8th Edn., Addison Wesley, UK., ISBN: 9780321313799, Pages: 840.

Thelin, T., P. Runeson and C. Wohlin, 2003. An experimental comparison of usage-based and checklist-based reading. IEEE. Trans. Software Eng., 29: 687-704.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Design and power by Medwell Web Development Team. © Medwell Publishing 2024 All Rights Reserved