References

Althuis, M.D., J.M. Dozier, W.F. Anderson, S.S. Devesa and L.A. Brinton, 2005. Global trends in breast cancer incidence and mortality 1973-1997. Intl. J. Epidemiol., 34: 405-412.
CrossRef  |  PubMed  |  Direct Link  |  

Andreea, G.I., R. Pegza, L. Lascu, S. Bondari, Z. Stoica and A. Bondari, 2011. The role of imaging techniques in diagnosis of breast cancer. Curr. Health Sci. J., 37: 55-61.
Direct Link  |  

Anonymous, 2003. MATLAB® creating graphical user interfaces. MathWorks, Natick, Massachusetts, USA. https://www.math.lsu.edu/system/files/BuildGUIs.pdf

Aoki, K. and M. Kudo, 2008. Feature and classifier selection in class decision trees. Proceedings of the Joint IAPR International Workshops on Statistical Techniques in Pattern Recognition (SPR) and Structural and Syntactic Pattern Recognition (SSPR), December 4-6, 2008, Springer, Berlin, Germany, ISBN:978-3-540-89688-3, pp: 562-571.

Azar, A.T., 2012. Statistical analysis for radiologists interpretations variability in mammograms. Intl. J. Syst. Biol. Biomed. Technol., 1: 28-46.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Bovis, K. and S. Singh, 2000. Detection of masses in mammograms using texture features. Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Pattern Recognition, Volume 2, September 3-7, 2000, Barcelona, pp: 267-270.

Chandrashekar, G. and F. Sahin, 2014. A survey on feature selection methods. Comput. Electr. Eng., 40: 16-28.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Duijm, L.E.M., M.W.J. Louwman, J.H. Groenewoud, L.V. Van de Poll-Franse and J. Fracheboud et al., 2009. Inter-observer variability in mammography screening and effect of type and number of readers on screening outcome. Br. J. Cancer, 100: 901-907.
CrossRef  |  PubMed  |  Direct Link  |  

Giger, M.L., 2004. Computer-aided Diagnosis in Diagnostic Mammography and Multimodality. In: RSNA Categorical Course in Diagnostic Radiology Physics: Advances in Breast Imaging-Physics, Technology and Clinical Applications, Radiological Society of North America (Ed.). RSNA., America, USA., pp: 205-217.

Haralick, R.M. and K. Shanmugam, 1973. Textural features for image classification. IEEE. Trans. Syst. Man Cyb., 3: 610-621.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Hsu, C.N., H.J. Huang and S. Dietrich, 2002. The annigma-wrapper approach to fast feature selection for neural nets. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part B: Cybern., 32: 207-212.
CrossRef  |  

Jiang, L., E. Song, X. Xu, G. Ma and B. Zheng, 2008. Automated detection of breast mass spiculation levels and evaluation of scheme performance. Acad. Radiol., 15: 1534-1544.
CrossRef  |  PubMed  |  Direct Link  |  

Kayode, A.A., B.S. Afolabi and B.O. Ibitoye, 2015. An explorative survey of image enhancement techniques used in mammography. Intl. J. Comput. Sci. Issues, 12: 72-79.
Direct Link  |  

Kayode, A.A., O.A. Odeniyi and A.O. Efunboade, 2017. Enhancement and segmentation of mammograms for further analysis. Intl. J. Comput. Sci. Inf. Secur., 15: 417-424.
Direct Link  |  

Khuzi, A.M., R. Besar, W.W. Zaki and N.N. Ahmad, 2009. Identification of masses in digital mammogram using gray level co-occurrence matrices. Biomed. Imaging Intervention J., 5: 1-13.
PubMed  |  

Ladha, L. and T. Deepa, 2011. Feature selection methods and algorithms. Intl. J. Comput. Sci. Eng., 3: 1787-1797.
Direct Link  |  

Maitra, I.K., S. Nag and S.K. Bandyopadhyay, 2011. Identification of abnormal masses in digital mammography images. Int. J. Comput. Graphics, 2: 17-30.
Direct Link  |  

Nasiruzzaman, A.B.M., 2010. Using MATLAB to Develop Standalone Graphical User Interface (GUI) Software Packages for Educational Purposes. In: Matlab-Modelling, Programming and Simulations, Leite, E.P. (Ed.). Sciyo Publisher, Rijeka, Croatia, ISBN:978-953-307-125-1, pp: 17-40.

Nithya, R. and B. Santhi, 2011. Classification of normal and abnormal patterns in digital mammograms for diagnosis of breast cancer. Intl. J. Comput. Appl., 28: 21-25.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Ooms, E.A., H.M. Zonderland, M.J.C. Eijkemans, M. Kriege and B.M. Delavary et al., 2007. Mammography: Interobserver variability in breast density assessment. Breast, 16: 568-576.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Pradeep, N., H. Girisha, B. Sreepathi and K. Karibasappa, 2012. Feature extraction of mammograms. Int. J. Bioinf. Res., 4: 241-244.
Direct Link  |  

Qian, W., X. Sun, D. Song and R.A. Clark, 2001. Digital mammography: Wavelet transform and kalman-filtering neural network in mass segmentation and detection. Acad. Radiol., 8: 1074-1082.
CrossRef  |  PubMed  |  Direct Link  |  

Refaeilzadeh, P., L. Tang and H. Liu, 2007. On comparison of feature selection algorithms. AAAI. Workshop Tech. Rep., WS-07-05: 34-39.
Direct Link  |  

Saeys, Y., I. Inza and P. Larranaga, 2007. A review of feature selection techniques in bioinformatics. Bioinformatics, 23: 2507-2517.
CrossRef  |  PubMed  |  Direct Link  |  

Soh, L.K. and C. Tsatsoulis, 1999. Texture analysis of SAR sea ice imagery using gray level co-occurrence matrices. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 37: 780-795.
CrossRef  |  

Tang, J., R.M. Rangayyan, J. Xu, I. El Naqa and Y. Yang, 2009. Computer-aided detection and diagnosis of breast cancer with Mammography: Recent advances. IEEE Trans. Inform. Technol. Biomed., 13: 236-251.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Vasantha, M., V.S. Bharathi and R. Dhamodharan, 2010. Medical image feature, extraction, selection and classification. Intl. J. Eng. Sci. Technol., 2: 2071-2076.
Direct Link  |  

Zheng, B., C. Mello-Thoms, X.H. Wang and D. Gur, 2007. Improvement of visual similarity of similar breast masses selected by computer-aided diagnosis schemes. Proceedings of the 2007 4th IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro, April 12-15, 2007, IEEE, Arlington County, Virginia, pp: 516-519.